Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.f <br />. . <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />of the City of La Porte <br />Page Two <br />June 1, 1982 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2. Compensation for Services Rendered. This firm charges fees for legal <br />services in accordance with the applicable factors set out and DR2-106, Rules of Disciplinary <br />Conduct of the legal profession, a copy of which is attached. Factors (1), (4), and (7) will <br />have chief weight in this case. Factor (2) is remote and Factor (3) is, generally, not <br />ascertainable or inapplicable because few law firms engage in the practice of charging fixed <br />amounts f or particular services. Factor (5) does not appear to have any weight at this time. <br />We have represented the City on one prior occasion several years ago, but the City is not a <br />constant client within the scope of Factor (6). This is not a contingent fee proposal and <br />therefore Factor (8) is inapplicable. . . . <br /> <br />Factor (1) involves the concept of chargeable time which has been defined by the <br />State Bar of Texas as the amount of time which :would be spent in the performance of the <br />legal service by a lawyer who possesses neither more nor less than reasonable competence. <br />The time actually spent by the lawyer may be more or less than or the same as chargeable <br />time, since the concept takes into account the degree of experience and special expertise <br />which one lawyer may possess over another lawyer of average competence in a particular <br />specialized field. The concept also involves billing the client proportionately less than the <br />actual time involved if the firm does not specialize in a certain field. It is obvious that <br />Factor (7) will be considered closely in connection with Factor (1). Charges at actual time <br />rates for purposes of interim billing ranging from $180.00 per hour for partners ($200.00 after <br />January 30, 1982), down to $65.00 per hour for newly licensed associates will be used. These <br />rates will be adjusted depending on inflation, but the City will be given notice of any increase <br />in the hourly rates if, as and when implemented. In the following paragraph, a fee retainer is <br />discussed. When it is exhausted, billings will be issued for time expended at actual time rates <br />only and chargeable time, if any, will be taken into account in any final billing. All fees and <br />reimburseable cost and expenses payable to the firm are payable at the firm's offices in <br />Houston, Harris County, Texas. <br /> <br />3. Retainer For, Services. A retainer of $12,500.00 cash payable to "Sears and <br />Burns" for services already performed and to be performed under this Agreement should be <br />paid to us if and when this proposal is accepted. This retainer will remain the property of the <br />firm irrespective of the outcome of the representation. . <br /> <br />4. Costs and Expenses - Reimburs,ement. From time to time, the firm will <br />incur court costs and legal expenses on the client's behalf associated with the case. The City <br />agrees to pay the firm at its offices in Houston, Harris County, Texas, all such costs and legal <br />expenses made on the City's behalf. To defray initial expenses, the sum of $500 payable to <br />"Sears and Burns Trust Account" should be forwarded with the separate retainer. This Trust <br />Account will be maintained in a separate bank account from the firm's account and used <br />solely to defray the described costs and expenses. Whenever the balance of the cost deposit <br />drops below $100, we will request the City to replenish the Trust Account by an additional <br />amount to build it up again. An accounting of this Trust Account will be furnished from time <br />to time, and will be furnished upon the City's request at any time. <br /> <br />5. Miscellaneous Matters. In many instances, we are able to furnish a <br />"guesstimate" of the range in which a final fee may fall with the caution that the range is <br />simply a guess and not a fixed estimate. Because of the numerous parties or potential parties <br />to this dispute, it is not even feasible to furnish a guesstimate. It is obvious that a maximum <br />or absolutely fixed fee cannot be set in advance of the representation unless the firm takes <br />into account every possible difficulty -- possible, not just probable -- in quoting a figure. No <br />lawyer can prophesy the course of any litigation and, particular, complex litigation. <br />