Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~:~ <br /> <br />,i <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />Doug Latimer, Chairman, ~ <br />Planning & Zoning Commission <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Six Month Review of Zoning Ordinance and Map <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />February 19, 1988 <br /> <br />For the past several months, the Planning & Zoning Comoission, as <br />required by Section 11-504, has been engaged in a review of City Zoning <br />Ordinance No. 1051 and the City of La Porte's Official Zoning Hap. The <br />purpose of this review is as follows: <br /> <br />" . . . [The Plann ing " Zon ing Commi 55 ion shall] rev ieH to determine. <br />~lhether the Ordinance has become deficient, obsolete and inadequate for <br />any reason, including the following: <br /> <br />1. Defects in the original text <br />2. Defects in the zoning map <br />3. Deficiencies created by improper or lax adninistration <br />and subsequent amendments to the original ordinance <br />which are inconsistent, conflicting or a8biguous. <br />4. Inconsistency with State Statutes or judicial decisions." <br /> <br />Using these guidelines" the Commission has co~pleted a <br />comprehensive review. of both the zoning map and ordinance. This revieH <br />was conducted during study sessions, regular meetings and public <br />hearings. <br /> <br />Hhile the <br />individual1y, <br />categories: <br /> <br />proposed <br />they can <br /> <br />amendments <br />be gro.uped <br /> <br />are too numerous to <br />into the following <br /> <br />mention <br />general <br /> <br />. <br />.. - <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Hap issues <br /> <br />+'~ <br /> <br />1. A chanGe of zoning cl~ssificaticn is propo~ed for three <br />tracts. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT B <br />