Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Signatories (other than the State of Texas, if it is a Signatory), and to dismiss with prejudice each <br />of the pending appeals brought by anyone of the Signatories (other than the State of Texas, if it <br />is a Signatory). The precise form of the motions shall be tailored to each case, but will be <br />substantially as described below with respect to each Signatory and proceeding: <br />1. In Docket No. 9850, now pending in the Austin Court of Appeals on <br />remand from the Texas Supreme Court, OPC agrees to dismiss and <br />withdraw any points attacking the Commission's order, and to request that <br />the judgment of the District Court affmning the Commission's order be <br />affirmed in all respects; <br />2. In Docket No. 8230/9010, now pending on remand in the Austin Court of <br />Appeals, Ope agrees to withdraw and dismiss such of its arguments, if <br />any, as remain pending questioning the validity of the Commission's order, <br />and request that as to the issues originally raised by OPC [but not issues <br />raised by the State of Texas] the judgment of the District Court affirming <br />the Commission's order be affmned in all respects; <br />In Docket No. 6668, OPC, HL&P and the City of Houston each agree to <br />dismiss their respective appeals pending in the District Court with <br />prejudice, and request that the order of the Commission be affmned; <br />HL&P agrees to dismiss with prejudice its appeal from the Commission's <br />order in Docket No. 10092 and request that the Commission's order be <br /> <br />affirmed. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />HOUOJ:9l1046 <br /> <br />-37- <br />