My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-1998-2227
LaPorte
>
.Ordinances
>
1990's
>
1998
>
O-1998-2227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:39:00 PM
Creation date
7/26/2006 7:15:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
3/23/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~CQ)~W <br /> <br />Kathy Powell, David Webb and J made site visits and asked a series of questions of each proposers. As a result <br />of that process, we believe each proposer is qualified to provide Delinquent Tax Collection Services to the City <br />and the School District. A brief summary of each proposer follows: <br /> <br />City Attorney Knox Askins and John Armstrong submitted a joint proposal with the firm of Linebarger <br />Heard, Groggan, Blair, Graham, Pena & Sampson, LLP, which is the largest Delinquent Tax Collection Finn <br />in the State, representing 1,350 clients, including the City of Houston, Houston ISD and Harris County. In <br />visiting with Linebarger, we found it is common for them to team with a local attorney firm when responding <br />to RFP's. Since this firm is the Delinquent Tax Collector for Harris County, the City currently receives <br />benefit on suits they file on properties in La Porte. They have offices in La Porte and downtown Houston. <br /> <br />Perdue, Brandon, Fielder, Collins & Mott, L.L.P is also a large firm, having 800 clients. They are the second <br />largest firm in the Houston market. Their offices are located across from the appraisal district. <br /> <br />Tracey Foster is a sole practitioner. Her background includes several years ofTa"< Collection experience before <br />going to school to obtain her law degree. Her offices are near Ellington Field. <br /> <br />In approaching the selection process, one item of importance to us was the use of a single firm for the collection <br />of taxes. I ask you to remember that our last contract with Dexter Joyner was specifically designed to end at the <br />same time the School's contract ended. Attached is a letter sent to the School District which supports this <br />position. By using one firm, it provides office efficiencies that are important to keep our cost down and our <br />customer turn around time as quick as possible. If we dealt with two firms, we would have areas of duplicity of <br />effort. <br /> <br />We believe the joint collection agreement with the School District has been of big benefit to the taxpayer. By <br />collecting local taxes out of one office, savings to the taxpayer are probably in the $125,000 per year range. I <br />know for the City alone, our annual net costs would go up by about $35,000 if we were not joint venturing with <br />the School. <br /> <br />With this in mind, Kathy Powell and David Webb visited and agreed upon the Perdue finn. As mentioned earlier, <br />each of the three firms proposing were qualified and would do us a good job. The selection of the Perdue fum <br />was based primarily on familiarity with the rrrm. Both Kathy and David have worked with the Perdue finn before <br />and have had good relationships with them. Dr. Sawyer has also utilized them. In addition, I worked with Perdue <br />when I was the Tax Collector for the City of University Park. Since 75% of the total delinquent tax balance <br />belongs to the School District, we listened very strongly to their needs. They specifically wanted Perdue and we <br />had no reason to not want them. <br /> <br />Please remember the City incurs no costs for the Delinquent Tax Collection Process. It is all born by the <br />Delinquent Taxpayer with a state mandated 15% add-on fee. A brief summary of changes from the current <br />provider include: <br /> <br />The rum will provide title work on all property before suit is :filed and will incorporate all past owners <br />as part of the suit. This step will assist in providing clean title to property that otherwise would remain <br />uncollectable and unsaleable. Under our current provider, no title work was done on the property before <br />it was filed upon which has resulted in the City obtaining title to property via a Constables Sale and the <br />title we obtain is clouded by past owners. <br /> <br />The rum will load our delinquent tax information into their own computer system and provide us with <br />access to that system. This will allow us to keep track with the work they are doing and we can get up <br />to the minute status reports. Under our current provider, all information was provided to us on hard copy <br />and we were required to update the system ourselves. We were essentially operating the clerical portion <br />of his office. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.