Ordinance 95 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

.. . e e e ,. A RESOLUTION DENYING AN EXCEPTION AT APPLICATION NO. fILED BY WHEREAS, exception has of Adjustment property at Application No. been duly filed with the by , an appeal for an Secretary of the Board for the , described as follows: and WHEREAS, said application requests an exception under Article as amended, of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the ex- tension of the use of the ~remises at for auto ~ales to the rear portion thereof for a distance of not more than 50 feet beyond the north district boundary line of the Business A District dividing said premises, the affected area being the rear portion of premises known as and the' rights of ingress and egress to the rear portion thereof from WHEREAS, all members of the Board viewed the property on , and WHEREAS, after due notice a hearing was held by the Board on ,. at o'clock, in the City Hall, Lomax, Texas, to consider the application,' and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard, and their testimony recorded, and WHEREAS, all testimony has been carefully considered and the following pertinent facts noted: 1. The applicant's property in its entirety falls into the following three separate district classifications: a. is commercial b. is Residential B-1, and c. a narrow strip in between the above parcels, constituting the rear of ' is Local Business A. 2. The was generally reclassified from local Business A to its present Residential B-1 on 19___; said reclassification included the property at 3. The applicant purchased said property on at which time it was subject to the zoning requirements of a Residential District Class B-1. 4. The applicant's request for a Conditional Use to permit a parking lot on said premises was denied by the City Inspector on 5. The property the applicant for the pal use at premises. in question is presently being used by parking of cars incidental to the princi- and for ingress and egress to said 6. Said use appears to be a violation of which does not per~it a parking lot accessory to a commercial use in a Residential B-1 district. 7. Prosecution for said violation by the City Inspector has been stayed pending final determination of the p~~ent appli- cation. 'r ....,." ,'.,.. .... .". .T;"~' . :1:.. ". ~-;. :- " . .". ...:' 'I. .~ ..:/~;'- .:. . .:: "... . I ~ , ...., .::....