My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
R-2000-14
LaPorte
>
Legislative records
>
Resolutions - GR1000-05 Ordinances & Resolutions
>
2000's
>
2000
>
R-2000-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:48:38 PM
Creation date
7/27/2006 2:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Resolution
Legislative No.
R-2000-14
Date
9/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />'.e <br /> <br />Invasion of orivacv - The proposed legislation would only take a photograph of the rear <br />of the vehicle and would not identify the driver or passengers. Photographs would only <br />be taken of violators operating vehicles on public streets. The American Civil liberties <br />Union (ACLU) is not opposed to cameras being used to enforcement traffic violations. <br />Finally, the life saving benefits of this enforcement technique outweighs the privacy of a <br />red light violator. <br /> <br />Photograohlc red Iiaht enforcement will be used where it Is unwarranted - The proposed <br />legislation will place population requirements, so that photographic enforcement can <br />only be used in cities with high traffic volumes. <br /> <br />The cameras will be used for surveillance - A photographic red light enforcement <br />system cannot be manipulated to be used for surveillance are similar purposes. A <br />photograph is only taken after sensors detect a violator. <br /> <br />This is a monevmaker for municioalitles - The proposed legislation will set the fine at a <br />level so that photographic red light enforcement is revenue neutral to cities. The <br />legislation will also stipulate that any excess revenue generated from this enforcement <br />technique must be used in an appropriate manner. <br /> <br />Bill structure: <br /> <br />In order to Increase the chances of passage, photographic red light enforcement <br />I~glslation will address concerns expressed by legislators and others. We propose future <br />legislation: <br /> <br />. Require the photograph of the violator be taken of the rear of the vehicle in <br />order maximize the privacy of the driver. The citation would then be a civil <br />offense (similar to a parking ticket). <br />. Place population requirements in order to ensure photographic red light <br />enforcement Is only used in areas with high traffic volumes. <br />. Require City Councils approve this enforcement technique before it can be <br />implemented In a municipality. <br />. Ensure any excess revenue from photographic red light enforcement is used in a <br />proper manner. <br /> <br />Recommended Action: <br /> <br />For numerous years traffic signal disregard has been a significant problem in the United <br />states and specifically Texas. Ten states have given cities the ability to used <br />photographic red light enforcernent to address this Issue, and proven that this <br />enforcement technique Is effective. It is important the Texas Legislature pass enabling <br />legislation that will give municipalities the authority to utilize photographic red light <br />enforcement and we encourage cities and other entitles to join In this effort. Please <br />discuss this Important matter with your local legislators and gain their support for this <br />needed enforcement technique. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.