My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-1952-429
LaPorte
>
.Ordinances
>
1950's
>
1952
>
O-1952-429
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:38:19 PM
Creation date
10/23/2006 5:09:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
9/9/1952
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CRITICAL FEATURES IN FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS. With masonry walls and <br />partitions the critical feature in determining the fire resistance rating under the <br />standard fire test is usually the temperature rise on the unexposed surface or in <br />other words its resistance to heat transmission. However, with some constructions, <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />HOLLOW UNITS. It should be noted that with hollow constructions and with <br />constructions composed of hollow units the thickness of the hollow space is a <br />relatively minor factor in the, fire resistance. Comparative tests have indicated <br />that it is the total thickness of solid material in the unit rather than the total <br />thickness of the unit which is the principal factor. Therefore, with constructions <br />involving hollow block or tile, use of a thicker unit of the same material will <br />increase the rating only if and as the thickness of solid m~terial in the unit is <br />increased. An increase in rating may be obtained by filling the cores, <br /> <br />WALLBOARD. Special gypsum wallboard or coreboard with a specially formu- <br />lated core affords greater fire resistance than does the conventional or ordinary <br />type gypsum wallboard or coreboard of the same thickness. Constructions in- <br />corporating a, special wallboard or coreboard are so noted under details of con- <br />struction. <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />The <br />increases <br /> <br />The increase in fire resistance obtained by addition of a plaster coating is <br />shown in the tables for certain constructions. In general, a facing of ~ -inch <br />portland cement or gypsum plaster will usually increase the fire resistance of a <br />I-hour assembly by ~-hour. On 2-, 3- and 4-hour assemblies the increase for the <br />same kind and thickness of plaster will be progressively greater, amounting usually <br />to about I hour on a 4-hour assembly. If applied to two sides of a masonry par- <br />tition the effectiveness is double that of plaster on one side. Plaster coatings, to <br />be effective in adding to the fire resistance periods when combustible structural <br />members are framed in, must be on the exposed faces of the walls opposite to the <br />faces in which the combustible members are inserted. <br /> <br />aggregate in <br /> <br />use <br />its <br /> <br />of perlite or vermiculite <br />resistance to fire. <br /> <br />place <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />sand <br /> <br />in <br /> <br />plaster, <br /> <br />'. <br />'I. <br /> <br />The richness of the plaster mix has a considerable eliect on the fire resistance, <br />particularly with gypsum plaster, and if the listed ratings are to be obtained the <br />mix must be as specified. <br /> <br />I,'" <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PLASTER. In constructions where plaster coatings provide an important part <br />of the fire resistance, it is important to note the kind of plaster, its thickness, the <br />type and proportions of the ingredients, and the type and method of fastening the <br />lath. Gypsum plaster is superior to portland cement or lime plaster in resisting <br />heat transmission. Unless asbestos or other fiber is added to portland cement <br />plaster, its fire resistance is further limited by cracking and spalling. <br /> <br />Applying Test Results to Modified Forms of Construction. Because small <br />differences in quality of materials, forms of construction and dimensions of parts, <br />in some cases, make large differences in the fire resistance, care must be exercised <br />in applying test ratings to constructions which differ from those actually tested. <br />Some of the factors which need to be considered are the following. <br />CONCRETE. The fire resistance of concrete depends to a considerable extent on <br />the kind and quality of coarse aggregate used. Siliceous gravel aggregates which <br />contain a large percentage of chert or flint give lower ratings than limestone, <br />trap rock, slag and a number of other aggregates. <br />The relation between kind of aggregate and fire resistance well <br />lustrated in the ratings given for concrete protections for steel <br /> <br />rating IS <br />columns. <br /> <br />Many of the tests on columns were made prior to 1925 with column loads <br />somewhat lower than permitted today. In certain cases this necessitates considera- <br />tion of the effect of greater allowable loads on the fire resistance rating. <br /> <br />Many tests have been made on samples smaller than the minimum size speci- <br />fied in the standard fire test. Such tests cannot be considered the equivalent of <br />tests made on samples of standard size. In some cases they may be satisfactory <br />in determining heat transmission characteristics, from which fairly reliable esti- <br />mates of the fire resistance rating may be made, provided other characteristics <br />affecting performance of the assembly in the standard fire test have been estab- <br />lished, but such estimates must be made with considerable caution. <br /> <br />The above factors have been taken into account in arriving at the ratings <br />shown in the following tables. <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />.: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />FIRE RESISTANCE' RATINGS <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.