Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />September 30, 2005 <br /> <br />Large Lot Concerns: <br /> <br />The Large Lot Proposal has been submitted as a method to "keep Lomax rural," and as a <br />protection against losing the privilege to own and keep large animals. Also, there is the fear that <br />4-H club activities would be lost or curtailed as a normal residential development proceeds. <br /> <br />Currently,large lots are permitted by ordinances in the City of La Porte. There has never <br />been a movement to stop citizens from owning and keeping large animals in the Lomax area. <br />Conversely, this privilege has been supported throughout the existence of Lomax. <br /> <br />The proposal to keep Lomax "rural" is nothing more than a euphemism to stop or curtail <br />development in the Lomax area. If the Large Lot proposal is passed into an ordinance, that <br />purpose will be accomplished. <br /> <br />Sixteen percent (16%) ofthe City of La Porte's land area that can be developed is <br />located in the Lomax area. This Large Lot proposal would prevent development in eighty percent <br />(80%) of the available land for development in the Lomax area. This can be explained by the fact <br />that present ordinances permit five to one (5 to 1) residential roof top density per acre as opposed <br />to one (1) residential rooftop density per acre in the Large Lot proposal. This eighty percent <br />(80%) reduction in potential development translates into a twelve point eight percent (12.8%) <br />reduction in the potential development of the City of La Porte. <br /> <br />If the City of La Porte experienced this kind of a reduction (12.8%) in growth potential, i.e. <br />industrial plant dosings with resulting population and tax base reduction, City officials would be <br />holding special meetings to try to alleviate this kind of reduction to the City. <br /> <br />The method used to plot Lomax and the divisions of these plots since the original survey <br />is not conducive to the development of large sub-divisions. Any new ordinance should be written <br />to permit three (3) to four (4) residential rooftops per acre. One example of how to develop the <br />outlots and still maintain the rural atmosphere is the development of Laura Lane located off L <br />Street in Lomax (see Attachment 1). This kind of development would enhance the Lomax tax <br />base. <br /> <br />As written, the Large Lot proposal for the Lomax area severely impacts land owners with <br />ten (10) acres or less, and also has a negative impact on the City of La Porte and La Porte <br />Independent School District tax base. An alternative proposal of three (3) to four (4) residential <br />roof tops per acre would be a better solution. <br /> <br />Request to City Council: <br /> <br />In the event the Large Lot proposal is put into effect, property impacted by the La Porte <br />Thoroughfare Plan, as outlined in Chapter Five of the La Porte Comprehensive Master <br />Development Plan, should be exempted. I should note that my property is impacted by theAThoroughfare Plan, which connects H Street to L Street. <br /> <br />Sidney A. Grant <br />1907 Lomax Dr, <br />La Porte, TX 77571 <br />