Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />As required by ordinance, 854 notices of public hearing were mailed to property owners within and around the District. <br />After careful consideration, the Planning and Zoning Commission forwarded the Large Lot Committee's <br />recommendations to City Council for approval. The final votes for the three motions were as follows: Create the <br />District with additional regulations (5-1 with the dissenting vote in regard to the I acre minimum), Adopt boundaries <br />(6-0), and Rezone from Low-Density Residential & Medium Density Residential to Large Lot District (6-0). The <br />Commission forwards the recommendation to Council with the additional consideration that th~ ~lanning Department and <br />the City Attorney also add a Section to the Ordinance outlining the procedures for a VariancelO~ther mechanism to allow <br />relief from the regulations governing the Large Lot District for consideration during possiblWeliberations by the Zoning <br />Board of Adjustment. (q() <br /> <br />Staff will present a detailed briefing on the proposed changes during the Public Hearing portion of the October 24, 2005, <br />Council Meeting. A summary of the final proposed changes from the Committee is attached at exhibit 2. Given that <br />there are several economic issues associated with the proposed change, Council should review the attached Information <br />Paper, dated October 7, 2004, (exhibit 6) that was considered by the Large Lot Committee concerning comparative <br />developmental cost and tax base analysis between a Large Lot Development and a standard 6000 SF, single family <br />detached development currently allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />Per the request by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Staff coordinated with the City Attorney and determined <br />that possible applications to the ZBOA for relief from the provisions governing the propose Large Lot District <br />would fall under Section 106-191, Special Exceptions. In order to answer the Commission's concerns, Staff <br />recommends that the City Council, upon consideration of approval for creating the District and associated <br />regulations, that the following wording, for a special exception be included within the amendments to Chapter 106, <br />Section 106-191, Special Exceptions., (b) (4): <br /> <br />(4) To deviate from the minimum lot size or width requirements for property wit/,in the Large Lot <br />District, where the Board finds that all of the following conditions are shown: <br /> <br />a. that one or more lots located in the same block as the subject property are not uniform in <br />terms of shape and/or size so t/,at any further subdivision oflhe subject property cannot be in <br />accordance with the regulations governing the District; <br />b. it can be demonstrated that the subdivision will not circumvent the spirit of the District <br />regulations, or particularly, the rural character of tl,e District; and, <br />c. granting the special exception will not be injurious to the value or enjoyment of adjacent <br />properties within the District. <br /> <br />There were 854 mail-outs with 50 responses returned; 34 in favor of creating the District and 16 against. <br /> <br />Action Required bv Council: <br />1. Conduct public hearing. <br />2. Consider taking action on three recommendations for approval by P&Z on: <br />. To create the Large Lot District and adopt additional regulations for the District, with further <br />amendments to add a special exception clause <br />. Adopt boundaries for the Large Lot District <br />. Rezone from Low-Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Large Lot District. <br /> <br />Approved for City Council Ae:enda <br /> <br /> <br />)pt'f~ <br />Date <br />