Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning & Zoning comm.on <br />November 18, 2004 <br />Maximum Height <br />Zoning Ordinance Amendment <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. Since family/residential structures are habitually not sprinklered, Staff, at this <br />point, recommends residential use requirements as currently presented in the <br />Zoning Ordinance regarding maximum allowable heights remain intact. <br /> <br />. Commercial/Industrial maximum height requirements are removed. <br /> <br />Conclusions: <br /> <br />The footprint of remaining land in the commercial and industrial zones of the City, due to <br />shape and size, is becoming more restrictive to development. Economic development is <br />one of the highest Council priorities. The. factors promoting economic development, <br />however, must be balanced with factors of 'safe' development. <br /> <br />Given that the LPFD has no issues with maximum heights of building (with building and <br />fire codes remaining current and updates approved); and since the Fire Code and the IBC <br />are both restrictive on the heights of buildings in light of other considerations on a case- <br />by-case basis, the City Staff feels that it is iri the best interests of the City of La Porte to <br />eliminate the stated height restrictions for commercial/industrial properties. In lieu of the <br />current restriction of 45 feet, each project would be reviewed on its own merits and in <br />relation to the existing Fire Code and IBC to determine supportability. In addition, the <br />Planning Department would assume the flow testing duties to ensure fire suppression <br />capabilities in relation to the height of the. proposed structure. We believe that this <br />measure represents an equitable balance between economics and safety. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Upon the conclusion of the workshop held on October 21, 2004, the Commission <br />reached a consensus that the 45' maximum height rule remains intact. The stated <br />reasons are as follows: <br /> <br />. There have not been many requests for variances or special exceptions to the <br />rule and P&Z felt the action to remove the rule was premature. <br /> <br />. Several members felt that the 45' rule remained a valuable tool to monitor <br />growth and development within the City and was in the best interests of the <br />citizens to review applications on a case-by-case basis regarding the <br />maximum height of development. <br /> <br />It is, therefore, recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission forward <br />their official position for action by City Council that the maximum height rule of 45' <br />remain in Chapter 106 (Zoning). <br />