Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City of La Po..te <br />ESloblis/led ] 8,92 <br /> <br />Memo <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Debra Feazelle, City Manager -""" ; <br /> <br />Nicholas Finan, Interim Planning Directo7ff' <br />Debbie Wilmore, Chief Building Official <br /> <br />Frvm: <br /> <br />CC: <br /> <br />John Joems, Assistant City Manager <br />Knox Askins, City Attorney <br />John Armstrong, Assistant City Attomey <br /> <br />Date: May 6, 2004 <br /> <br />He; Declaration of an Emergency for Purpose of Waiving Bid Process for Demolition of Structures at 200 <br />Garfield <br /> <br />Given City Council authorized the demolition of nine structures locatecl at 200 Garfield that were determined by <br />City as dangerous and unsafe at the City Council Meeting of April 26, 2004, staff is concerned with the time that <br />it would take to proceecl under the normal bid process. Staff is requesting City Council to waive the bid process <br />due to public safety concerns listed below, and that City Council determine that an emergency exists providing <br />staff the ability to expedite the demolition of the nine dangerous and unsafe buildings. <br /> <br />Reasons for declaration of an emergency are as follows: <br /> <br />1. The buildings have been declared dangerous and unsafe by City Council after a public hearing and no one <br />provided testimony to the contrary, including the owner, who was present and abstained from any <br />comments. <br /> <br />2. All nine structures have been determine to contain asbestos, including friable asbestos (non-contained). <br /> <br />3. There have been two fires located in separate buildings, one as recently as November 15, 2003, exposing <br />firefighters to dangerous conditions and asbestos. <br /> <br />4. The public hearing for consideration of City Council declaring these buildings dangerous and ordering their <br />demolition on April 26, includes testimony that children are not only in the vicinity of these structures, but <br />may be going into the buildings, exposing them to asbestos and other dangers, despite the City's attempts <br />to keep the structures sealed. Testimony provided by one resident stated she has seen individuals entering <br />the buildings. <br /> <br />5. The City has been contacted numerous times about the conditions: vandalism, graffiti, high weeds, etc. <br />Since the Year 2000, there have been the following code enforcement calls for service: weeds - 22; <br />securing of building - 20; graffiti - 11; building maintenance - 1; and debris - 6. <br /> <br />6. The Texas Department of Health may be willing to waive the 1o-day notice requirement and agree that at <br />least the two burned units constitute an emergency for the purpose of asbestos and allow the city to remedy <br />the current public nuisance after it reviews paperwork and material provided on this matter. <br />