O-2004-1501-XXX scup04-007 amending 03-002; rejected by Council

Browse Search

Bayforest Ranch SCU04-007 July 15, 2004 Page 4 of 5 e e proximity of the dwellings when compared to apartments. When apartments are vacant; control, security and observation are still centralized. An increase in traffic and number of parked cars in the development may contribute to the difficulty of monitoring the safety of the development. In addition, public services will be difficult to maintain in the area. A security plan must be submitted for review. . Miscellaneous Issues - In this location and surrounding area, the Commission and the TIRZ have promoted development of a character and type that exceeds the typical development seen in the community. .:. There was some consideration when the Commission and Council approved the previous SCUP allowing multi-family units where the Land Use Plan and Comprehensive Plan Update promoted single-family development. This was based on presentation of a higher-end multi-family complex with market driven rates. Additionally, the present SCUP provides for an acceptable density arranged on a zero lot line concept. .:. The developer previously stated that the perimeter landscaping along SH146 and the drainage channel would equal that proposed for the SH146 boundary of the Golf Course Community. The general layout is not complete. .:. If the Commission considers this project (or other freestanding units), staff suggests that they meet the standards of our zoning and development ordinances to match the character of the adjacent development. .:. Harris County Housing Authority has stated they may participate in this proposed project financially and possibly become an owner. This may further complicate long-term management issues beyond the life of the tax credit program. .:. No covenants or restrictions were proposed to take care of short or long-term management and maintenance issues. (If received, the Tax Credit Program does require certain protections that eventually expire) Recommendation: SCU#04-007 as forwarded to City Council is attached for your review. Given the continuing concerns about the general nature of the project and the financing tools being considered, and the applicant's wishes to withdraw the "plat" and reassess options available, we recommend denial ofSCU#04-007. Zoning would revert back to PUD with the underlying land use as Low Density Residential, or as approved on preceding agenda item#5.