Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Finan, Nick <br /> <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Cc: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Dunham, Champ <br />Friday. December 19.20039:53 AM <br />Finan. Nick <br />Boale, Mike <br />RE: Eddie Gray's water well request <br /> <br />As I have stated to Mr. Gray, the small portable office building is not of allot of concern to the Fire Department. Our <br />concerns are as follows: <br />. Halardous (flammable) cargo stored on site that could result in the need for very large volumes of water <br />. Sale of the property at a later date where larger buildings etc. could be built <br /> <br />If there is some way to insure that the property will not store halardous, combustible. or flammable liquids, and that <br />the property could not expand to include these commodities or build other buildings on the site should the property sell, <br />the Fire Department would not have a problem waving the hydrant requirement. <br />One other thing to consider is future development in the area. Are there other sites in the immediate area that could <br />be developed, and will they be expecting a "waiver", or will they be required to meet the code. Our concerns are for our <br />firefighters. We get the calls and are expected to suppress fires to save lives and property. Considering there is <br />currently very limited access to fire hydrants in the area, our firefighters and the community would be at risk depending <br />on ''tanking operations" for structure fires or fires involving hazardous cargo. At present, the closest hydrant to the area <br />in question is on the "P" street right of way east of the Strand Rail Yard, on the south side of the railroad tracks. <br />Apparently the railroad has blocked off access over the railroad tracks and are storing rail cars across the blocked off rail <br />crossing. <br />Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact us. <br />