Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM <br /> <br />Agenda Date Requested, 1-2.12-: 11 <br />Requested By: Wayne ~ <br />Department: Plannin2 <br /> <br />Aopropriation <br />Source of Funds: N/A <br />Account Number: <br />Amount Budgeted: <br />Amount Requested: <br />N/A <br />Budgeted Item: <br /> <br />Report: _ Resolution: _Ordinance: -X....- <br /> <br />Exhibits: Ordinance Amending Chapter 78 <br />Chapter 78, Code of Ordinances <br />Appendix A-Fees <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br />On January 8, 2007, the City Council received a workshop presentation on the proposed changes to the Code of <br />Ordinances, Chapter 78, and Appendix A, "Fees" for possible amendments or modifications. After a complete <br />review, the Wrecker Committee recommended the following modifications to Chapter 78: <br />· That the number of E- Tags for auto wreckers be regulated by the promotion of Public Safety (conforms to <br />Federal Law where the "need and necessity" language was struck down). <br />· Clarification for applicants' right of appeal to City Council (eliminates conflict between Sections 78-233 <br />and 78-224) <br />· Clarifies the right of an applicant whose permit is being considered for revocation or suspension to have a <br />10-day written notice and a public hearing (eliminates oonflict between Sections 78-223 and 78-272). <br />· Clarifies charges for applications. <br />· Eliminates the perceived contlict in the ordinance, Section 78-297, by ensuring that only one vehicle is <br />permitted by an E- Tag (previously it appeared that multiple vehicles were allowed on one E- Tag). <br />· Adds the process in Section 78-297 that an applicant must have his proposed wrecker yard inspected by the <br />Inspections Division to ensure compliance with zoning district regulations prior to the public hearing <br />(previously the only requirement to complete the process was that the yard was within City limits) <br />· Changes the word "licensed" to "permitted" in Sections 78-300 and 78-301 regarding the permit process to <br />avoid confusion with terms used by State regulations. <br />· Clarifying charges for non-consent tows. <br />Upon the review of fees, the Committee recommended that given the fact that there has been no increase in the base <br />fee rate for a non-consent tow (consent tow fees cannot be regulated) in the last 15 years, and given that operational <br />costs have increased, the rate for a normal tow be increased from $65 to $80 (exclusive of additional charges for <br />special conditions such as rollover). The maximum charge for a tow, inclusive of all situations, would be increased <br />from $105 to $120. <br /> <br />At the conclusion of the workshop, Council directed Staff to bring the recommended changes back for formal action. <br />No public hearing is required. <br /> <br />Action Required bv Council: <br />Approve an ordinance amending Chapter 78 "Vehicles for Hire", and Appendix A "Fees" of the Code of <br />Ordinances. <br /> <br /> <br />Date ;Jh /07 <br />