Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Building Codes Ad Hoc Comm <br />Minutes of October 6, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />authority as to the adoption of the building codes. Tom Campbell questioned if <br />the Board of Appeals can be approved and recommendation of building code be <br />presented to Council as one package. <br /> <br />The motion was made by Tom Campbell to recommend the codes and the Board <br />be established at the same time, with clarification from the City Attorney. Second <br />by Tommy Moser. The motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Bill White opened the floor discussion concerning pros and cons of a committee <br />operating under the "open meeting rules." Following the discussion a motion was <br />made by Mike Clausen to operate under open meeting rules. Second by Tommy <br />Moser. After further discussion this motion was tabled. <br /> <br />The Committee requested the City Attorney to be invited to the next meeting to <br />clarify an Appeal Board's make-up, purpose and actions. <br /> <br />There was discussion relating to how the codes will be reviewed. The Committee <br />asked about books and Debbie Wilmore reported all the code books should be <br />arriving this week. Later a motion was made by Tom Campbell to request a <br />representative from ICC and C3 to attend a meeting to share specifics on their <br />respective codes. Second by Ed Yung. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />The Committee asked for clarification on which codes they will be reviewing <br />since some codes are State mandated. Ed Yung would like to know how they <br />compare with the current SBCCI codes. Nick Finan requested that Debbie <br />Wilmore outline the codes in question. Motion by Ed Yung to leave all options <br />open on reviewing the codes. Second by Carlos Smith. Motion carried with one <br />descending vote by Stanley Briers. <br /> <br />VI. ADJOURN <br /> <br />Motion to adjourn at 7:40 P. M. by Tom Campbell. Second by Tommy Moser. <br /> <br />Submitted by, <br /> <br />