Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Building Codes Ad Hoc Committee <br />Minutes of January 14, 2004 <br /> <br />Tommy Moser, Tom Campbell, Tom Stringer, Stanley Briers, Ron Holt, Mike <br />Clausen, Bill White <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Members Absent: <br /> <br />Robert Ortiz, Carlos Smith, Ed Yung <br /> <br />City Staff Present: <br /> <br />Interim Planning Director Nick Finan, Chief Building Official Debbie Wilmore, <br />Inspection Services Coordinator Sherry Jennings <br /> <br />1. CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Chairman Mike Clausen called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. <br /> <br />2. CONSIDER APPROVING MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 7,2004. <br /> <br />Motion by Mr. Stringer to approve the minutes of January 7, 2004. Second by Mr. Campbell. <br />The motion carried. <br /> <br />3. CONTINUE DISCUSSION, IDENTIFY SELECTIONS AND VOTE ON <br />RECOMMENDATION OF CONSTRUCTION CODES TO CITY COUNCIL. <br /> <br />Chairman Clausen referred to the timeline he composed and stated the committee needs to fmalize a <br />recommendation soon if they plan to present it to City Council on February 9. He would like all <br />members in attendance next week for the vote. <br /> <br />Mr. Campbell discussed the item of being "united" and after the discussion at last week's meeting that <br />was not going to happen. Mr. Clausen stated if they cannot come to a general consensus, the <br />committee will report what the majority votes. <br /> <br />Chairman Clausen requested the committee state which code they would vote for and give specific, <br />positive reasons. The committee discussed the plumbing, gas, mechanical and building code. The <br />majority felt C3 is more descriptive and easier to understand In addition, it would be a better training <br />tool for new employees. <br /> <br />4. CONTINUE DISCUSSION AND FORMALIZE DRAFT RECOMMENDATION ON CODES <br />APPEAL BOARD AUTHORITY, ORGANIZATION, MAKE-UP AND <br />PROCESS/PROCEDURES. <br /> <br />Mr. Clausen stated the committee needs a fIrst draft for next week on the guidelines of the Appeal <br />Board by merging the contents of Option "C and "0". A "straw" poll was taken on how many <br />members would be appropriate for the new board. After discussion the committee <br />