Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />City of La POlie <br />Es/uh1islwd 18.92 <br /> <br />Memo <br /> <br />To: Members of the Planning and Zoning Com <br />From: Nicholas Finan, Interim Planning Director <br />CC: John Joems, Assistant City Manager <br />Wayne Sabo, City Planner <br />Masood Malik, Planning Coordinator <br />Date: March 26, 2004 <br />Re: Canada Road Zone Change Request to Multi-Family <br /> <br /> <br />I apologize for the lateness of this, but since the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of March 24 <br />was canceled, I wanted to update you. <br /> <br />There was a staff meeting to discuss the agenda items. Unfortunately, in my absence, some of the <br />thoughts on the Canada Road zone change request from R-2 to R-3 for a multi-family development <br />were not totally incorporated into the analysis. <br /> <br />This is one that has some history: <br />In the past, the Planning and Zoning Commission has been reluctant to rezone property in this area, <br />including nonconforming uses. Due to the growth in single-family development in the area and the <br />Comprehensive Plan, this area over an extended period of time could become a strong single-family <br />area. The City has recently purchased land directly across the street for a park. The plans are not <br />finalized, but this park could be a passive park. The City has recently acquired the necessary right-of- <br />way to make Canada Road a four-lane divided roadway to improve traffic in this area. The broker <br />representing this property, as well as adjoining property, has been told previously that the 60 or so <br />acres should be presented as a Planned Unit Development (PUD), but that even then, apartments may <br />not be suitable. <br /> <br />Concerns: <br />Based on the Comprehensive Plan, if it is to be changed, an overall plan should be developed for the <br />area taking into account the pipeline easement, drainage system, existing single-family developments, <br />the proposed park, the nonconforming industrial enterprise, the widening of Canada Road, and the 40 <br />to 60 acres of undeveloped property. A PUD with a specific land plan would be the better approach <br />than the incremental parcel-by-parcel change. <br /> <br />There is concem for an apartment (a minimum of 100 units and allowed up to 180 units that could have <br />an average of two to four residents) could impact a passive park negatively (it has not been determined <br />if the park will be passive or active, yet). <br /> <br />While Canada Road would handle the traffic after the improvements, the apartments generate two to <br />two and one-half times the traffic load as a typical single-family development. <br /> <br />If this zone change is approved, but this particular development does not get financing, then any type of <br />apartments could be constructed. Some staff does not feel this application should be approved. <br /> <br />Again, I apologize for the lateness of this memo. <br />