O-2006-2933 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Ordinance No. 2006- ~q 3,3 Page 2 WHEREAS, it has heretofore come to the attention of the Board that the building( s) located on Blk. 98. Lots 15-16. La Porte. which is further described as 502 N. lIth S1., Harris County, Texas, has, for the reason of neglect or misuse, been allowed to deteriorate into a condition of decay or partial ruin or has become a public nuisance or hazard, as defined in Section 82-473 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of La Porte~ and WHEREAS, said Board has heretofore made and filed its written report, June 21. 2006 finding said building to be in fact a dangerous building~ WHEREAS, City Council received such report, and ordered notice to the record owner( s) of said property, Calixtro Castillo, whose address is P. O. Box 83 L La Porte. Tx 77572-0831, Calixtro Castillo, whose address is 502 N. 11th St. La Porte. Tx 77571, Calixtro Castillo % Calixtro Castillo. Jr. whose address is 721 Princeton. Deer Park. Tx 77536. and Calixtro Castillo. Jr. whose address is 10815 N. L S1.. La Porte. Tx 77571 that a hearing as provided in Section 82-477 of said Ordinance would be held at 604 W. Fairmont Parkway, at the Council Chambers, City Hall, City of La Porte, Texas, at which time the Council would hear evidence for and against the conclusions of the Board~ WHEREAS, the City Secretary has heretofore served notice of said hearing upon said owner( s), by registered mail, return receipt requested, which return receipt indicated that said owner(s) received said notice on Post Office Returned as "Undeliverable" on July 26.2006 (P. O. Box Address). Post Office Returned as "Undeliverable" on July 26.2006 (N. 11th Address). Post Office "Attempted" Delivery on July 26.2006 (princeton Address). and Post Office "Attempted" Delivery on July 26. 2006 (N. L S1. Address). a date more than ten (10) days before the date set for said hearing~ WHEREAS, at said date, time, and place, City Council met in regular session to conduct such public hearing, at which time evidence was presented both for and against the conclusions of the Board~