Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RE UEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM <br /> <br />Agenda Date Requeste . <br /> <br />Requested By: Wayne J. s~tfJ <br /> <br /> <br />Appropriation <br /> <br />Source of Funds: N/ A <br /> <br />Account Number: <br /> <br />Department: <br /> <br />Planninl! <br /> <br />Amount Budgeted: <br /> <br />Report: _ Resolution:_Ordinance:--X <br /> <br />Amount Requested: <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />Exhibits: Ordinance <br />Area Map <br /> <br />Budgeted Item: <br /> <br />SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION <br />Recent developments have generated discussion on possible controls on architectural standards or <br />facades on buildings fronting the major corridors or thoroughfares throughout the City of La Porte. While <br />initial discussions centered on the Main Street District as a way to facilitate interest in redevelopment of <br />the downtown area, concern has grown over the proliferation of "metal" buildings along the City's major <br />access ways which may detract from further development. <br /> <br />As reviewed with Council in the January 30, 2006, retreat, current ordinances allow some controls to be <br />included with Special Conditional Use Permits associated with uses listed as "Conditional" within certain <br />zoning Districts and for construction within Planned Unit Developments (PUD) which usually normally <br />follow some form of developer's agreement. No such control, however, is associated with construction of <br />a development whose use is "permitted" within a zoning district. While the building must meet code, the <br />City cannot apply architectural standards or facade material. Council previously approved design and <br />construction standards for commercial and industrial buildings within TlRZ #1. The zoning <br />ordinance, Chapter 106, Section 106-680 now requires building to be a1oo% masonry and/or <br />glass product. Nonconforming structures must come into compliance with these standards per <br />existing regulations in Sections 106-262 and 106-268. These Sections generally require <br />conformity when damage or renovation is over 50% of the total value, or upon review of a <br />nonconforming lot of record. <br /> <br />Several cities in the area have approached this issue by writing fac;ade ordinances defining standards to <br />be used on new construction fronting along identified thoroughfares. Typically, these ordinances <br />mandate the use of a combination of brick, masonry and glass to a certain percentage to achieve the <br />desired effect. <br /> <br />After several workshops, the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 19, 2006, conducted a public <br />hearing and received Citizen input on provisions governing building design and architectural standards for <br />new projects along major thoroughfares in General Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts. After <br />some discussion, it was recommended that the proposed standards be included as footnote 8 to Section <br />106-443 and footnote 10 to Section 106-522 and be applicable to new construction in GC and BI along <br />SH 146, SH 225, Fairmont parkway, West Main, Barbour's Cut Boulevard, Old Highway 146 <br />(Broadway), Underwood Road, Bay Area Boulevard, Sens Road, Canada Road and East Main. <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission excluded Main Street District from these provisions since that <br />District is considering separate and distinct architectural standards. Heavy Industrial (HI) and Light <br />Industrial (L1) Districts were not considered by the P&Z. The P&Z also recommended that a Historical <br />District be considered for exemption. Given that that District has not been considered, as yet, for <br />creation, the ordinance does not yet address that District and may be considered in the future. <br />