My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-2008-1285-R increase Assistant Chiefs to (2) positions and reduces the Lieutenants from (5) to (4) (original in 1981)
LaPorte
>
Legislative records
>
GR1000-05 Ordinances - GR1000-05 Ordinances & Resolutions
>
2000's
>
2008
>
O-2008-1285-R increase Assistant Chiefs to (2) positions and reduces the Lieutenants from (5) to (4) (original in 1981)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:39:24 PM
Creation date
2/19/2008 3:34:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
1/28/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(h) If a person appointed under this section is charged with an offense in violation of <br />civil service rules and indefinitely suspended by the department head, the person has the same <br />rights and privileges of a hearing before the commission in the same manner and under the same <br />conditions as a classified employee. If the commission, a hearing examiner, or a court of <br />competent jurisdiction finds the charges to be untrue or unfounded, the person shall immediately <br />be restored to the same classification, or its equivalent, that the person held before appointment. <br />The person has all the rights and privileges of the prior position according to seniority, and shall <br />be repaid for any lost wages. <br />(i) A person serving under permanent appointment in a position in the classification <br />immediately below that of the department head on September 1, 1983, is not required to meet the <br />requirements of this section or to be appointed or reappointed as a condition of tenure or <br />continued employment. <br />Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. <br /> <br />Upon returning from the training I did contact Clark Askins and asked him to review Chapter <br />143.014 and asked him how many Assistant Chiefs in the fourth classification I could appoint. <br />He originally indicated one, but after talking about it advised that actually I could appoint four <br />based on the example provided to Mr. West. He stated that the way it was written seemed to <br />imply that a fourth level also applied to the number of positions, but when looked at carefully it <br />is not the case. I additionally contacted Danny Jackson the Police Legal Advisor for the <br />Baytown Police Department who is very familiar with the Civil Service Laws. When asked how <br />many persons I could appoint to Assistant Chief using the same example of having three <br />Lieutenants he did not hesitate to say four. He pointed out that the fourth classification reference <br />only applied to when I could appoint by having at least four classifications and the number of <br />positions I could appoint is based on the number of positions immediately below the Chief in <br />1983, specifically January 1, 1983. <br /> <br />I have prior to the Pre Budget Retreat discussed the re-organization of the Police Department <br />with the Civil Service Commission and they have supported the concept and need for the second <br />Assistant Chief position. On Friday, January 11, 2008 I talked to Keith Trainer, the Chairman of <br />the Civil Service Commission, and advised him that based on the Commissions prior support of <br />the concept and the legal opinions I had received that I intended to proceed and submit an <br />Ordinance to the City Council to amend the Civil Service Ordinance accordingly on January 28, <br />2008. <br /> <br />The purpose of this document is to brief you on the status of the re-organization and the issue of <br />the appointment of the personnel in the fourth Civil Service Classification of Assistant Chief. It <br />is also to serve as a briefing document for the Council for the amended ordinance so they would <br />be able to understand why the position will not have to be a tested position as originally <br />presented at the Pre Budget Retreat in April. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.