My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-2006-2919 Passed
LaPorte
>
Legislative Records
>
Ordinances - GR1000-05 Ordinances & Resolutions
>
2000's
>
2006
>
O-2006-2919 Passed
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:39:20 PM
Creation date
5/6/2008 11:05:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
9/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2006 Effective Tax Rate Worksheet <br /> <br />Entity Name: City of La Porte <br /> <br />Date: 09/5/2006 <br /> <br />See pages 13 to 16 of the Texas Comptroller's 2006 Truth-in-Taxation Manual for an explanation of the effective tax rate <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />2005 total taxable value. Enter the amount of2005 taxable value on the 2005 tax $1,695,166,598 <br />roll today. Include any adjustments since last year's certification; exclude Section <br />25.25(d) one-third over-appraisal corrections from these adjustments. This total <br />includes the taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings(will deduct in line 2) <br />and the captured value for tax increment fmancing(will deduct taxes in line 14). <br />2005 tax ceilings. Counties, Cities and Junior College Districts. Enter 2005 total $0 <br />taxable value of homesteads with tax ceilings These include the homesteads of <br />homeowners age 65 or older or disabled. Other units enter "0" If your taxing <br />units adopted the tax ceiling provision in 2005 for homeowners age 65 or older <br />or disabled, use this step. <br />Preliminary 2005 adjusted taxable value. Subtract line 2 from line 1. $1,695,166,598 <br />2005 total adopted tax rate. (/$100) 0.710 <br />2005 taxable value lost because court appeals of ARB decisions reduced 2005 <br />appraised value. <br />A. Original 2005 ARB values: $28,260,000 <br />B. 2005 values resulting from fmal court decisions: $19,950,000 <br />C. 2005 value loss. Subtract B from A. $8,310,000 <br />2005 taxable value, adjusted for court-ordered reductions. Add line 3 and line 5 $1,703,476,598 <br />C. <br /> --- <br />2005 taxable value of property in territory the unit deannexed after January 1, $0 <br />2005. Enter the 2005 value of property in deannexed territory. <br />2005 taxable value lost because property first qualified for an exemption in2006 <br />. Note that lowering the amount or percentage of an existing exemption does not <br />create a new exemption or reduce taxable value. If the taxing unit increased an <br />original exemption, use the difference between the original exempted amount <br />and the increased exempted amount Do not include value lost due to freeport <br />exemptions or tax abatements. <br />A. Absolute exemptions. Use 2005 market value: $181,274 <br />B. Partial exemptions. 2006 exemption amount or 2006 percentage $9,682,545 <br /> exemption times 2005 value: <br />C. Value loss. Add A and B. $9,863,819 <br />2005 taxable value lost because property first qualified for agricultural appraisal <br />(l-d or I-d- I), timber appraisal, recreationaVscenic appraisal or public access <br />airport special appraisal in 2006. Use only those properties that first qualified in <br />2006; do not use properties that qualified in 2005. <br />A. 2005 market value: $0 <br />B. 2006 productivity or special appraised value: $0 <br />C. Value loss. Subtract B from A. $0 <br />Total adjustments for lost value. Add lines 7, 8C and 9C. $9,863,819 <br />2005 adjusted taxable value. Subtract line 10 from line 6. $1,693,612,779 <br />Adjusted 2005 taxes. Multiply line 4 by line 11 and divide by $100. $12,024,650 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />10. <br />11. <br />12. <br /> <br />Truth In Taxation - May 2006 <br /> <br />Page: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.