My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-2008-3092 CLP electing to be included in class action lawsuit for collection of Hotel-Motel taxes from Online Travel Companies
LaPorte
>
Legislative records
>
GR1000-05 Ordinances - GR1000-05 Ordinances & Resolutions
>
2000's
>
2008
>
O-2008-3092 CLP electing to be included in class action lawsuit for collection of Hotel-Motel taxes from Online Travel Companies
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:39:26 PM
Creation date
10/20/2008 5:09:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
7/14/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />UNITED STAT~S DISTRICT C()URT <br />WESTERN DISTRICT OF tEXAs <br />SAN ANTONIO DIVISION <br /> <br />FILED <br /> <br />Def~ndants <br /> <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br /> <br />Qt..ERK, u.s, <br />\IIJE$TERN Dl <br />BY~ <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF SAN ANTONIO <br /> <br />Plaintiff <br /> <br />v; <br /> <br />CIVIL NO. SA..06..:CA-38i..OG <br /> <br />HOTELS~COM,etal <br /> <br />Order on Class Certification <br /> <br />PendingbefotetheCourt isPlain1iWs Motion for Cla.ss Certincatit)n CDkt. # 45). <br /> <br />Defendants filed a response (Dkt. # 55, 56) and Plaintiff filed a reply (Dkt#59). Plaintiff <br /> <br />arl1ended its corn plaint (Dkl:. # 74) and then supplemented itsmotionCDkt. #88). TheCourt <br /> <br />detetminedthattUscovety on class certification issues was hecessaty, and. th.e parties ehgagedill <br /> <br />rathetemeljS't've':pre-certificatiohdisQ0very. At the end of the discovery period, Plaintiff filed a <br /> <br />briefin support oflts supplemental motion (Dkt. # 152) and Defendal1tsfiIed their opposition to <br /> <br />Pla.intiff's supplementalmotlon for class certification (Dkt. # 163, 164). Pla.intiff then filed its <br /> <br />second supplementalbriefin support of class certification(Dkt. # 190). <br /> <br />011 May 16~ 17, 2007, the Gourt held an evidentiary hearihg on the motion for class <br /> <br />certification. The Court heardevideJ:1ceand legal arguments from all parties and, in the interest <br /> <br />ofjudicia.l economy; allowed certain evidence to be presented by submission. After the hearing, <br /> <br />Plaintlfffile:dits post-heating brief ili support of its supplemental motion for class certification <br /> <br />([>&1.. #217,218) and Defendants filed their post~heatii1g briefin opposition thereto (D1.1.. # 22(}). <br /> <br />The parties' experts, whotesrifiedat the class certification hearing, were also permitted to <br /> <br />supplement their reports. Their supplemental and rebuttal reports were filed along with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.