My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-19-09 Building Codes Appeals Board minutes
LaPorte
>
City Meetings
>
Minutes
>
Building Codes Appeals Board
>
2009
>
02-19-09 Building Codes Appeals Board minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2016 10:52:31 AM
Creation date
5/2/2009 2:21:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Building and Development
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/19/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Building Codes Appeals Board <br />Minutes of February 19, 2009 <br /> <br />Members Present: Tom Campbell, Terry Bunch, Ken Schlather, Ron Holt, Paul Larson, Mark <br />Follis and Michael Reedy <br /> <br />Members Absent: None <br /> <br />City Staff Present: Debbie Wilmore, Chief Building Official <br /> <br />Others Present: None <br /> <br />1. CALL TO ORDER <br />Meeting called to order at 6:00 P.M. by Chairman Tom Campbell. <br /> <br />2. CONSIDER APPROVING MINUTES FROM THE JANUARY 15,2009 MEETING <br />Motion to approve the January 15,2009 minutes, as submitted, was made by Terry <br />Bunch. Second by Ken Schlather. Paul Larson abstained from the vote since he was <br />absent from the meeting. Motion passed. <br /> <br />3. REVIEW, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER A BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO CITY <br />COUNCIL REGARDING A POSSIBLE LOCAL AMENDMENT ON DRINKING <br />FOUNTAIN REQUIREMENTS IN THE 2006 PLUMBING CODE (IPC - S. 403, <br />TABLE 403.1, S. 410) AND BUILDING CODE (IBC - S. 2902, TABLE 2902.1) <br />Mr. Campbell asked Mr. Larson to lead the discussion since he was the Board member <br />requesting placement of this item on the agenda. Following some discussion, the Board <br />decided that the code requirements on drinking fountains were applicable for some <br />"classifications" while others should have alternatives available. <br /> <br />Mark Follis informed the Board that he had spoken with a code body representative and <br />he advised that the code allows the local Building Official to consider alternatives when it <br />is believed the intent is still met. <br /> <br />Mr. Follis made a motion that staff should develop a clarification policy rather than the <br />city doing an ordinance change. The Board suggested the policy state that standard code <br />requirements be met for assembly, educationa~ institutional, residential and storage <br />classifications. In addition, business, factory/industrial and mercantile classifications <br />with an occupancy load of (26) and over shall comply with the standard code <br />requirements. However, the policy should clarify that for business, factory/industrial and <br />mercantile classifications, with an occupancy load of (1) to (25), the applicant could <br />choose one of the following: use standard code requirements - or - use bottled water in <br />kitchenlbreak rooms that include refrigerators - or - use portable water coolers as an <br />approved alternative. Second by Mr. Larson. Motion passed unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.