Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c. Recyclinq and Reuse: <br /> <br />A city or utility should evaluate the potential of recycling and reuse because these <br />methods may be used to increase water supplies in the utility's service area. <br />Reuse can be especially important where the use of treated effluent from an <br />industry or a municipal system or agricultural return flows replace an existing use <br />that currently requires fresh water from a city's or utility's supply. Recycling of in- <br />plant process or cooling water can reduce the amount of fresh water required by <br />many industrial operations. Currently, the City of La Porte has a water reuse <br />program. Because of its size and daily flows, the reuse of treated effluent for <br />processed water has proven quite economical for the City of La Porte, with an <br />estimated three million gallons per month being used for this purpose. The City <br />of La Porte's Municipal Golf Course along with one of the City parks, Little Cedar <br />Bayou, are irrigated with plant effluent. This resulted in a savings of <br />approximately 60,000,000 gallons of potable water in 2005. <br /> <br />F. PLAN OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />.:. To reduce vvater consumption from levels that would prevail without conservation efforts <br /> <br />To reduce the loss and waste of water <br /> <br />.:. To improve efficiency in the use of water <br /> <br />.:. To implement Cl system to quantify the effects of tile plan <br /> <br />In aCCmci3r1Ce with 30 TAC Chapter 288.2, tile following five and ten year targets <br />have bet,1l established <br /> <br />Ei~t3~J5'f"Lli:1L9?t based on 1?~yeEl.I.l21liDSL9!lIlual averam~ <br /> <br />1) Reduce the per capita per day water usage' by 5 percent <br /> <br />?) Maintain a level of l.li1ccounted for water loss at 12 percent or less <br /> <br />1) H.ecluce ttle per <br /> <br />per day water usage" by an additional [) <br /> <br />2) f\chieve a level of unaccounted for water loss atl 0 percent or less <br /> <br />" f:or tile {Jwpose of this plan, per capita water use has been equated to use per <br />conned/on The number of connectiolJs IS more accurate. more easily Iracoa/Jle <br />and does not rely on celJsus information published infrequently. nlis allows for a <br />yearly tracking instrument will, real-time data and results <br /> <br />6 <br />