Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the La Porte Police Officers Association, our local organization, and Jerome Mckown is now <br />serving as President of the State TMP A organization. It can be confusing, but the issue of Meet <br />and Confer is with the local association or LPPOA. What is apparently in some disagreement is <br />which State organization will speak for the LPPOA, not the issue of Meet and Confer. <br /> <br />The fIrst thing that must be determined is who is the 'Association'. The law under 142.052 <br />defmes the "police officer association' means an employee organization in which police officers <br />employed by the municipality participate that exists for the purpose, on whole or part, of dealing <br />with the municipally ... concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of <br />work, or conditions of work affecting police officers. This means that the Association has to be <br />an employee organization, in this case the LPPOA. <br /> <br />Under 142.060 (b) the law indicates who can be bargaining agent for the association and that can <br />be one or more representatives to negotiate or bargain on the associations behalf. This is where <br />some people may be confused in thinking that the representative could be a representative from <br />one of the State organizations; however, 142.060 (c) clearly indicates that a municipalities <br />bargaining unit is composed of all th~ police officers of the municipality who are not the head of <br />the law enforcement agency or exempt under Section 142.058 (b) [Appointed by the Chief]. <br />This does not preclude TMP A or CLEAT representatives as coming in as "advisors" and that is <br />apparently the issue among the members, not the meet and confer process. <br /> <br />CLEAT's handout pretty well outlines the elements of meet and confer. The key issue is that <br />once the Association, LPPOA, submits a petition that is signed by the majority of the non- <br />exempt officers, everyone except Assitant Chief Corrales and myself. The Council has 30 days <br />to do one of the following: <br /> <br />1. The Council may recognize the Associations petition and grant recognition of the <br />Association as the police officers bargaining unit and not have to conduct a election by <br />voters. <br />2. The Council may defer recognition and order an election by the voters regarding whether <br />or not the City may meet and confer with the Association. <br />3. The Council may order a certifIcation election under section 142.054 of the Local <br />Government Code to determine whether the Association represents the majority of the <br />affected police officers. <br /> <br />If the Council opts for selection 3 and by doing so it determines by certifIed election that the <br />Association does represent the majority of police officer affected, then they within 30 must go <br />through option 1 or 2. Either path the Council will have to accept it or take it before the voters. <br /> <br />In the meetings we will look at each section of the law as attached to ensure everyone <br />understands the implication or application of meet and confer. Officer Matt Novasad as the <br />LPPOA President will also serve on the committee to provide input from the perspective of the <br />LPPOA. I will additionally ask one of the City Attorney's to attend to answer any legal issues. <br />These meetings will be open to the public and posted. <br />