Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and shall not have any excusable false alarm responses available in addition to those already used during that <br />period for an alarm system. Following the reinstatement, responses made prior to the date of revocation but not <br />part of the basis for the revocation shall be included in computations, however, responses from the date of <br />revocation through the date of reinstatement shall be chargeable, such charges must be paid before <br />reinstatement becomes effective. Reinstatement of the permit shall be the only means of restoration of the <br />lawful use of the alarm system hereunder after the permit has been revoked, provided however, that a new <br />permit must be applied for and issued before operation of the alarm system if the ownership or possessor rights <br />to the alarm site have changed since the most recent application or amendment thereof. <br /> <br />Sec. 30-45. Refusal to permit and revocation. <br /> <br />(a) The city may refuse to permit or revoke a permit for an alarm system for the following reasons: <br /> <br />(1) The applicant or permit holder has failed to make payment in full to the city of any service fees assessed <br />pursuant to this chapter within 60 days of the date the city has made notification of service fees owed by way of <br />the permit holders water bill notice or other means. <br /> <br />(2) The alarm system ofthe applicant or permit holder has or is of the type that has had a history ofunreliability. <br />For purposes of this chapter, an alarm system shall be presumed to be unreliable ifthe applicant or permit holder <br />accrues more than eight false alarms during a twelve month period, excluding any false alarms which may have <br />formed the basis for a prior revocation during that same twelve month period. In the event a permit is issued or <br />reinstated despite such presumption of unreliability, revocation shall occur if the permit holder accrues more <br />than three false alarms from the date of reinstatement. <br /> <br />(3) The city chief of police and or the city fire chief may establish additional standards to determine reliability or <br />unreliability of alarm systems as may be needed. <br /> <br />(b) Procedure. Refusal to permit or revocation. <br />(I) There shall be no refusal, termination, revocation or failure to renew a permit for an alarm system except as <br />set forth herein. The city shall give at least thirty days notice prior to revoking, failing to renew or otherwise <br />terminating a permit during which time a request for a hearing may be made. With respect to an application for <br />a permit which the city refuses to permit, the applicant shall be given at least 30 days within which to request a <br />hearing regarding such determination by the city to refuse to permit. The notice of refusal to permit or notice of <br />revocation shall specify the reason therefore. If a hearing is requested, the permit holder or applicant shall be <br />advised as to the date, time and place of such hearing. The hearing shall be before the city director of finance or <br />designee. The permit holder or applicant may appear in person or be represented by counsel, may present <br />testimony and may cross-examine all witnesses. <br />(c) All hearings shall be conducted under rules consistent with the nature of the proceedings, provided that the <br />following rules shall apply to such hearings: <br /> <br />(1) All parties shall have the right to representation by a licensed attorney although an attorney is not required; <br /> <br />(2) Each party may present witnesses in their own behalf; <br /> <br />(3) Each party has the right to cross-examine all witnesses; <br /> <br />(4) All the evidence presented before the hearing officer at such hearing may be considered in a final report; and <br /> <br />(5) The city director of finance or designee may adjust the amount of any service fees owed upon a showing of <br />good cause by the applicant or permit holder. <br />