Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS <br /> <br />Agreed Upon Procedures - Five Points Town Center Project (Continued) <br />September 21, 2010 <br /> <br />We also viewed what was represented, by the City Secretary, as all documents provided to Mrs. Aguilar <br />through public information requests. Original documents were also provided to us by the City through the <br />City Secretary's office. Documents provided to us included: <br /> <br />. City emai1s, memos, and other correspondence <br />. Genera11edger detail for the Proj ect <br />. Invoices, purchase orders, check requests, and other support documentation for all transactions <br />related to the Project <br />. Contracts related to the Proj ect <br />. The appraisal report for the Triangle property <br />. Loan and purchase documents related to land transactions <br /> <br />This review allowed us to gain the understanding of the Project needed for us to aid the City in <br />determining a reasonable scope for our work. <br /> <br />2. Review All Expenditures Coded to the Proiect and Compare to Applicable Policies: <br /> <br />One concern voiced by citizens was the possibility that Project expenditures may have violated applicable <br />City or EDC policies and procedures or Texas Local Government Code. <br /> <br />We began by interviewing the City Controller and Purchasing Manager to determine applicable <br />purchasing policies and procedures. We also obtained a copy of the City's purchasing policies and <br />procedures (Exhibit 1) and EDC bylaws (Exhibit 2). We then reviewed a project detail report (Exhibit 5) <br />provided by the City Finance department represented to contain all transactions related to the Project and <br />assessed those transactions for compliance with policies and procedures and state statutes. <br /> <br />Although transactions belong to the EDC and are not subject to City policies and procedures unless it is <br />specified in the EDC's own bylaws or policies and procedures, City personnel follow the more strict City <br />policies as summarized in Exhibit 42. Economic development corporations are generally considered <br />nonprofit corporations rather than governmental entities and, as such, are not subject to many of the legal <br />requirements that cities fall under including purchasing requirements. <br /> <br />According to the 2010 Texas Municipal Procurement Laws Made Easy (Exhibit 3), issued by the Texas <br />Attorney General's office: <br /> <br />The duty to comply with procurement laws is generally derived from some statute that <br />specifically requires an entity to make its purchases through such a procedure. The <br />implementing legislation for development corporations (the Development Corporation <br />Act) does not contain a provision that subjects economic development corporations to <br />municipal procurement requirements. These corporations are considered and treated for <br />most purposes as nonprofit corporations. Therefore, some legal analysts argue that if a <br />development corporation (a separate entity from the city) makes an expenditure, it would <br />not be required to follow municipal procurement requirements. Neither the Texas <br />Attorney General nor the Texas courts have directly addressed this question. However, <br />the Texas Supreme Court has found that a county park board must comply with the <br />competitive bidding requirements applicable to counties. The court found that the park <br />board was not autonomous and was under the supervision of the county to at least some <br />degree. Thus, the court reasoned that the park board should be treated as part of the <br />county for purposes of competitive bidding requirements. <br /> <br />7 <br />