Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR LA PORTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AGENDA ITEM <br />Appropriation <br />Agenda Date Requested:3/12/12 <br />Source of Funds: <br />Requested By:Stacey Osborne <br />Account Number: <br />Department:CMO <br />Amount Budgeted: <br />Report:Resolution:Ordinance: <br />Amount Requested: <br />Exhibits:A.Commonly Requested Incentives <br />Budgeted Item:YES NO <br />B.City of La Porte Incentives <br /> <br />SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION <br />The City of La Porte has been short-listed for a large project in the Battleground Industrial <br />District. The consultant for the project, Eric Geisler, has requested to meet with the EDC to <br />present a proposal for additional incentives beyond the standard Industrial District Agreement <br />(IDA) that the Cityoffersto all projects locating in the Industrial Districts. While not every <br />consultant asks to present, the Cityisoften asked to provide additional incentives for larger <br />projects, particularly within the industrial districts. Staffwanted to discuss some of these <br />incentives prior to Mr. Geisler’s presentation so the Board can be aware of the types of <br />incentives often requested, and have the opportunity to weigh in on whether to offer additional <br />incentives above and beyond what the City already has in place. <br />Attached is a list of incentives that are commonly requested by site selectors who are doing due <br />diligence for economic development projects.Thestandard response up to now has been to stick <br />with the incentives already in place, which in the Industrial Districts means onlythe IDA. The <br />IDA and the other incentive we have in place areexcellent incentives, but some EDC’s offer <br />additional incentives as standard procedure, and staffwanted to give the Boardthe opportunity to <br />do the same. <br />There are several options available to the Board: <br />1.Continue to allow staff to offer only the incentives that are in place today; or <br />2.Consider expanding the types of incentives that can be authorized at the staff level; or <br />3.Continue offering only the incentives that are in place todaybut allow the Board to <br />consider additional requestson a case-by-case basis; or <br />4.Other action desired by the Board. <br />Staff is seekingdirection from the Board on how to proceed forward with future incentive <br />requests. <br /> <br />