My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-01-2001 La Porte Redisticting Committee Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
Agendas
>
.AGENDAS
>
Open Meetings
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Planning/Inspections
>
La Porte Redistricting Committee
>
2001
>
10-01-2001 La Porte Redisticting Committee Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2006 11:06:10 AM
Creation date
11/21/2024 8:20:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Minutes
Date
10/1/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />U <br />Section 5 -Voting Rights Act <br />To obtain preclearance, the <br />governmental entity must show that <br />the proposed election change "does <br />not have the purpose and will not have <br />the effect of denying or abridging the <br />right to vote." <br />~~' <br />Effect for 2001 <br />Preclearance Process <br />^ DOJ may object if a proposed plan reduces <br />minority voting strength and a fairly drawn <br />alternative plan could ameliorate or prevent <br />that retrogression. <br />^ Burden is on the governmental body to show a <br />less retrogressive plan could not be drawn. <br />^ There may be more Section 2 suits, including <br />suits brought by the Department of Justice. <br />Preclearance under Section 5 does not insulate <br />a plan from Section 2 liability. <br />o..~.a......~......a,.............o...~~,,. ~~~ <br />Effect for 2001 <br />Preclearance Process <br />^ A plan may not be retrogressive <br />^ Retrogression is measured against the <br />benchmark <br />^ Benchmark is determined by looking at - <br />the last legally enforceable plan using <br />the PL94-171 census data <br />^ Retrogression is analyzed in terms of the <br />new plan as a whole compared to the <br />benchmark as a whole ~ ~' <br /> <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.