Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Minutes of March 28, 2013 <br /> <br />Board Members Present: George Maltsberger, Chester Pool, Charles Schoppe, Rod Rothermel, <br />and Sherman Moore (Alt 2) <br /> <br />Board Members Absent: T.J. Walker, Lawrence McNeal (Alt 1) <br /> <br />City Staff Present: Planning Director Tim Tietjens, City Planner Masood Malik, Deputy <br />Building Official Mark Huber, Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins, and <br />Office Coordinator Peggy Lee <br /> <br />1.Call to Order. <br /> <br />Chairman Maltsberger called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. <br /> <br />2. Consider approval of the January 10, 2013, meeting minutes. <br /> <br />Motion by Rod Rothermel to approve the January 10, 2013, meeting minutes. Second by <br />Charles Schoppe. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Ayes: George Maltsberger, Chester Pool, Charles Schoppe, Rod Rothermel, and Sherman <br />Moore (Alt 2) <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />3.Consider Appeal of the Enforcement Officers Decision #13-95000001 for the property located <br />at 500 West Main, further described as Lots 21-23, Block 56, Town of La Porte, Johnson Hunter <br />Survey, Abstract No. 35, La Porte, Harris County, Texas. The applicant appeals the <br />enforcement officers decision to deny a permit for Obsolescence <br />of which exceed 50% of replacement cost of the structure. This <br />the terms of Section 106-89 (3) of the Citys Code of Ordinances. <br /> <br />A.Staff Presentation <br /> <br />City Planner Masood Malik presented the staff report for Appeal of the Enforcement <br />Officers Decision #13-95000001. The applicant, Gilbert Diaz, is appealing the enforcement <br />officers decision to deny a permit for remodeling the primary structure located at 500 West <br />Main. The City has determined that the primary structure is substandar <br />bringing it into lawful compliance will exceed 50% of the replac <br />Mr. Malik showed photos of the interior and exterior of the building <br />several years ago. A City Council public hearing for possible action to declare the subject <br />structure a dangerous building has been continued to a later date to allow the Zoning Board <br />of Adjustment an opportunity to rule on the Appeal request. <br /> <br />The Board questioned the use of appraisal value when dealing with replacement cost. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />