My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-28-14 Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting
LaPorte
>
Agendas
>
.AGENDAS
>
Open Meetings
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Planning/Inspections
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2014
>
08-28-14 Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2014 12:39:50 PM
Creation date
11/21/2024 8:22:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
8/28/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BoardofAdjustmentRegularMeeting <br />August28,2014 <br />NewHopeBaptistChurchVariance <br />fortheconstructionofanadditiontotheexistingbuildingthatwouldnotencroachanyfurther <br />intothefrontsetbackthantheexistingbuilding. <br />Section106192(b.2)oftheZoningOrdinance(seetheattachedExhibitC)statesthattheBoard <br />isauthorizedtograntavariancewhentheBoardfindsthatanumberofcriteriaaremet.The <br />followingtableoutlinesthosecriteriaandƭƷğŅŅƭanalysisofthosecriteria. <br />Criterion:StaffFinding: <br />a.Thatthegrantingofthevariancewillnotbe Theproposedvarianceisareasonable <br />contrarytothepublicinterest.improvementtoanexistingstructuretocontinueits <br />viabilityinthecommunity.Noticewassenttoall <br />propertyownerswithina200footradiusfromthe <br />subjectsiteinaccordancewithcoderequirements. <br />Atthetimethisstaffreportwasdrafted,no <br />responsesfororagainstthevariancewerereceived <br />bystaff.Therewasonecallforinformation. <br />b.Thatliteralenforcementofthischapterwill Theexceptionalphysicalsituationthatisuniquein <br />resultinunnecessaryhardshipbecauseof thiscaseisthefactthattheexistingstructure <br />exceptionalnarrowness,shallowness,shape,alreadyencroachesintothe30footrequiredfront <br />topographyorotherextraordinaryorexceptional setbackby13.5feet.Inthissituation,requiringthe <br />physicalsituationuniquetothespecificpieceof applicanttocomplywiththerequiredsetbacks <br />propertyinquestion."Unnecessaryhardship"shall wouldnotbepracticalbecauseitwouldcausethe <br />meanphysicalhardshiprelatingtotheproperty relocationoftheofficeadditiontolocationthat <br />relatingto <br />itselfasdistinguishedfromahardship źƭƓƷasfunctionalfortheflowofthechurch.This <br />convenience,financialconsiderationsorcaprice,existingencroachmentrepresentstheunnecessary <br />andthehardshipmustnotresultfromthe hardship,whichwasnotaresultoftheğƦƦƌźĭğƓƷƭ <br />applicantorpropertyowner'sownactions.actions. <br />c.Thatbygrantingthevariance,thespiritofthis Inthiscase,stafffindsthattheauthorizationofthe <br />chapterwillbeobserved.variancewouldbeinthespiritofthechapterasthe <br />requestdoesnotproposeanencroachmentintothe <br />frontsetbackbeyondwheretheexistingstructure <br />encroaches. <br />already <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />ExhibitA:Applicationandsiteplanfortheproposedimprovements <br />ExhibitB:Areamap <br />ExhibitC:Sections106192through106195oftheZoningOrdinanceregardingvariances <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.