My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
City of La Porte Annual Budget 1991-1992
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
.BUDGETS & DOCUMENTATION
>
1990's
>
City of La Porte Annual Budget 1991-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2012 3:38:04 PM
Creation date
11/25/2024 9:46:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Budget & Budget Documentation
Date
10/1/1991
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
637
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The estimated results for fiscal year 1990-91 Utility Fund revenues are: <br /> <br /> Comparison of Projected Versus Estimated Revenues <br /> for Fiscal Year 1990-91 <br /> Over <br /> Projected Estimated (Under) Percent <br /> 1990-91 1990-91 Budget Variance <br />Water 2,679,000 2,692,500 13,500 .50 <br />Sewer 2,695,150 2,751,400 56,250 2.08 <br />Other 179.950 203.450 23.500 13.06 <br />Total Utility Fund 5,554,100 5,647,350 93,250 1.68 <br /> <br />The total revenues of the Utility Fund are expected to be $93,250 over the original <br />projection. The primary cause of this increase is in the sewer category. The sewer <br />charge was dependent on the customers "winter average" which was calculated as the <br />average water consumed during the months of November, December and January. The <br />City experienced an extremely dry winter last year, and this, coupled with the warm <br />winters experienced along the Texas Gulf Coast, provided higher averages than <br />normal. The water category also benefited from this seasonal variance. <br /> <br />In the other category, Interest Income was greater than projected and was caused by <br />greater cash available for deposit. The larger cash available to invest was caused <br />by revenues exceeding projections and expenses being less than budget. <br /> <br />The estimated results for fiscal year 1990-91 Utility Fund expenses are: <br />Comparison of Budget Versus Estimated Expenses <br /> for Fiscal Year 1990-91 <br /> Over <br /> Budget Estimated (Under) Percent <br /> 1990-91 1990-91 Budget Variance <br />Water Production 411,762 376,224 (35,538) (8.63) <br />Water Distribution 463,061 420,162 (42,899) (9.26) <br />Wastewater Collection 545,222 507,336 (37,886) (6.95) <br />Wastewater Treatment 656,436 606,225 (50,211) (7.65) <br />Customer Service 394,189 361,243 (32,946) (8.36) <br />Non Departmental 3.612.180 3.498.580 (113.600) (3.14) <br />Total Utility Fund 6,082,850 5,769,770 (313,080) (5.15) <br /> <br />The major variances in the operating divisions (other than Non Departmental) are <br />attributed to less maintenance ~equirements on the water and sewer system. <br /> <br />The Non Departmental Division is under" budget because of the delay in the completion <br />of the Surface Water Treatment Plant. The City did not start receiving water from <br />the Authority until February, 1991, while they had budgeted for a full year of <br />service. <br /> <br />1-16 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.