My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-23-19 Regular Meeting of the La Porte Development Corporation Board
LaPorte
>
Agenda packets
>
La Porte Development Corporation/4B
>
2019
>
09-23-19 Regular Meeting of the La Porte Development Corporation Board
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 5:25:45 PM
Creation date
3/7/2025 1:19:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
La Porte Development Board Corporation/Type B
Meeting Doc Type
Agenda
Date
9/23/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOARD <br />AGENDA ITEM <br />Appropriation <br />Agenda Date Requested: September 23, 2019 <br /> <br />Source of Funds: <br />Requested By: Ryan Cramer, E.D. Coordinator <br /> <br />Account Number: <br />Department: Administration <br />Amount <br />Budgeted: <br />Report Resolution Ordinance <br />Amount <br /> <br /> <br />Requested: <br />Budgeted Item: Yes No <br />Exhibits: Current program application <br /> <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />In the past year, staff and the Board have seen a considerable rise in Enhancement Grant applications, <br />which is not inherently bad, but many applications have strayed from the spirit of the program. To stem <br />this, staff would like to know if the Board would be interested in adding language that prevents just <br />signage or parking lot improvements to be eligible for the program. Staff believes it might be worth <br />removing parking lot improvements from the program altogether. <br /> <br />The other major change to the enhancement grant process will be the addition of the arts program. Many <br />cities around the country have a public arts programs, but few cities of size do. This starts a <br />series of questions to determine the direction the Board wants to go with the program: <br /> <br /> <br /> Does the City want to be buyers or collaborators? <br /> Many programs take the role of buyers by establishing funds to pay for these projects, often <br />paid for by a 1% addition to all CIP projects the City does (Wylie, Texas; Claremont, CA; <br />Greeley, CO; Bainbridge Island, WA) or just out of appropriate funds (Sugar Land, Texas). <br />The buyer role is very similar to the purchasing process for anything the City does. The City <br />would create a project and scope, then put out an open call to artists. This is costly, but it <br />gives the City total control and creates a permanent exhibit. <br /> <br /> Fewer programs take the role of collaborator, which is where the City would provide grants <br />to do the work. Houston and many major cities do this <br />(also seen in Elgin, IL). Another option is to lease the work and use public space as a gallery <br />for the artist to sell the work, some cities even taking a commission from sold pieces. Leasing <br />is growing in popularity and can be found in locations such as Florence and Redmond, OR; <br />Knoxville, TN; or Eden Prairie, MN. <br /> <br />s initial idea for the program was a hybrid of these two ideas, providing some upfront money for <br />materials, etc., then providing a public space for the artist to advertise their for sale art. The thinking <br />behind this concept was using the grant to create a stable stream of new art, a risk with the leasing <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.