My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-17-2001 La Porte Redistricting Committee Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Agenda packets 2010 to current
>
Agenda packets 2010 to current
>
Planning/Inspections
>
La Porte Redistricting Committee
>
2001
>
07-17-2001 La Porte Redistricting Committee Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2017 9:12:34 AM
Creation date
3/7/2025 1:23:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Minutes
Date
7/17/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
or following a special election is ~ject to the preclearance requiremey„ <br />(c) A juirisdiction conducting a referendum election to ratify a change in a practice or procedure that <br />affects voting may submit the change to be voted on at the same time that it submits any changes <br />involved in the conduct of the referendum election. A jurisdiction wishing to receive preclearance for <br />the change to be ratified should state clearly that such preclearance is being requested. See S <br />51.22 of this part. <br />(back to index) <br />51.18 Court-ordered changes. <br />(a) In general. Changes affecting voting that are ordered by a Federal court are subject to the <br />preclearance requirement of Section 5 to the extent that they reflect the policy choices of the <br />submitting authority. <br />(b) Subsequent changes. Where acourt-ordered change is not itself subject to the preclearance <br />requirement, subsequent changes necessitated by the court order but decided upon by the <br />jurisdiction remain subject to preclearance. For example, voting precinct and polling place changes <br />made inecessary by a court- ordered redistricting plan are subject to Section 5 review. <br />(c) In Emergencies. A Federal court's authorization of the emergency interim use without <br />preclearance of a voting change does not exempt from Section 5 review any use of the practice not <br />explici'~tly authorized by the court. <br />(back to index) <br />51.19 Request for notification concerning voting litigation. <br />A jurisdiction subject to the preclearance requirement of Section 5 that becomes involved in any <br />litigation concerning voting is requested promptly to notify the Chief, Voting Section, Civil Rights <br />Division, Department of Justice, P.O. Box 66128, Washington, DC 20035-6128. Such notification <br />will not be considered a submission under Section 5. [52 FR 33409, Sept. 3, 1987] <br />(back to index) <br />51.20 Form of submissions. <br />(a) Submissions may be made in letter or any other written form. <br />(b) The Attorney General will accept certain machine readable data in the following forms of <br />magnetic media: 3.5" 1.4 megabyte MS-DOS formatted diskettes; 5 1/4 " 1.2 megabyte MS-DOS <br />formatted floppy disks; nine-track tape (1600/6250 BPI). unless requested by the Attorney General, <br />data provided on magnetic media need not be provided in hard copy. <br />(c) All magnetic media shall be clearly labelled with the following information: <br />(1) Submitting authority. <br />(2) Name, address, title, and telephone number of contact person. <br />(3) Date of submission cover letter. <br />(4) Statement identifying the voting change(s) involved in the submission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.