Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Redistricting Committee Meeting Minutes (Cont'd) <br />August 28, 2001 -Page 2 <br />Population numbers reflected the following: <br />District 1 5650 +6% <br />District 2 5598 +5% <br />District 3 5,698 +6% <br />District 4 5,099 -4% <br />District 5 5,039 -5% <br />District 6 5,420 +2% <br />• <br />Sidney Grant noted the Committee would need to look at each block individually to fine <br />tune the numbers. The Committee agreed to take the map presented and look at ethnic <br />groups within each district. It appears that while upholding the +/-5% population <br />guidelines, the map as presented was a good attempt to avoid retrogression. In addition, <br />met all other criteria established by the City Council in the criteria ordinance. <br />Masood Malik provided the Committee with a breakdown. <br />Ed Matuszak informed the group the targeted number per district is 5,313. A perfect <br />target would be 266+ or 266-. <br />Sidney Grant noted we would be able to obtain this target by fine-tuning the numbers to <br />meet the +/-5%. <br />The Committee discussed making the following changes to the next proposed map: <br />Take in more of District 1 and add to District 4. The line would be drawn to out lot line <br />on H Street. <br />Pick up more in District 3 on Rocky Hollow. <br />Bring the new map with numbers +/-5% as discussed. At that time the Committee can <br />analyze against district breakdowns. <br />The Committee noted the lines were drawn in accordance with the guidelines the <br />Committee was required to follow. In addition, lines were moved to keep people with <br />common interests in the same district, and to keep the incumbent in their district. <br />Sidney Grant requested each district to state their opinion of map #R-005. Each member <br />was pleased with the map. It was noted they would like to see Creekmont Subdivision be <br />completely in District 3. <br />