My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
12-11-2001 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
Agenda Packets
>
Planning/Inspections
>
La Porte Redistricting Committee
>
2001
>
12-11-2001 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2006 1:22:51 PM
Creation date
3/7/2025 1:24:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Minutes
Date
12/11/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e e <br />Redistricting Minutes - Page 3 <br />The Committee followed these guidelines when considering new district lines. In some <br />instances they had to cut across a subdivision, but mainly you will see main streets or a <br />large stream. <br />Historic communities of interest shall be maintained in a single district, where possible, <br />and to the extent possible, neighborhoods shall not be split when drawing district <br />boundaries. <br />It is recognized, due to the size of the City, that it is not possible to use County voting <br />precincts. This has been a problem from the very beginning of this process, going back <br />to the 1980's. When Harris County draws its precincts, they must draw those to <br />accommodate congressional races, Texas Senate/Legislative races, County <br />Commissioner's Court and the Justice of the Peace Courts. It is very difficult for them to <br />do that. They can't accommodate themselves to a City district. We will continue to have <br />City districts containing one or more county voting precincts, which causes much <br />confusion, but we have not been able to deal with this matter to date. <br />The new district plans shall be based on the existing benchmark plan to the extent <br />possible. <br />Districts shall be drawn relatively equal in population size and based on the population <br />deviation factor of +/- 5%. <br />To the extent possible, districts should be reasonably compact and contiguous to one <br />another. <br />The new district plan shall recognize incumbent constituency relationships. This means <br />that it is proper for the committee to look at existing incumbency in the existing districts <br />and to the extent possible, retain that. The Committee, in drawing the new proposed <br />map, did this. <br />The Voting Rights Act was passed in the early 1960's primarily to protect minority <br />voting rights. The plan must be narrowly tailored to avoid retrogression to the extent <br />possible, within the allowable population deviation, in the position of racial minority, and <br />also language minorities as defined in the Voting Rights Act of 1965, with respect to their <br />affective exercise of the electoral franchise. That means, if you have a concentration of a <br />particular minority group, they will be taken into consideration when redrawing new <br />district boundaries and maximize their voting strength to the extent you can. <br />Based on the above referenced criteria established by federal law, federal regulations, and <br />federal court decisions, these were the main focus points and direction provided to the <br />Committee from City Council. <br />The Redistricting Committee has met twice a month for a number of months and has <br />prepared a number of map drafts before making a final recommendation to City Council. <br />Data provided from the Census Bureau was used in establishing maps. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.