My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-17-15 Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
Agenda packets
>
Planning/Inspections
>
Planning and Zoning Commission
>
2015
>
09-17-15 Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 2:58:19 PM
Creation date
3/7/2025 1:26:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
9/17/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PlanningandZoningCommissionRegularMeeting <br />September17,2015 <br />DiscussiononModificationstoSections106801,106802,and106803 <br />PlanningandDevelopmentDepartment <br />StaffReport <br />DISCUSSION <br />Asameansofbackgroundonthisitem,thePlanningandZoningCommissionreviewed <br />variousmodificationstoChapter106(Zoning)inearly2015andrecommendedtothe <br />CityCouncilsomemodificationsattheJune18,2015meeting.Oneofthose <br />modificationswastotheĭźƷǤƭtreepreservationregulations(Section106801)by <br />providinganexclusionforindividualsinglefamilydetachedresidentialfrombeing <br />requiredtomitigatetheremovaloftreesonresidentiallots. <br />ThetεƭrecommendationwasforwardedtotheCityCouncilandtheitemheardat <br />theirJuly13,2015meeting.TheCouncilrequestedthattheissueoftreepreservationbe <br />returnedtotheP&Zforfurtherdiscussion.City/ƚǒƓĭźƌƭactionwasbasedonconcern <br />fortheimpactthattheserequirementswouldhaveondevelopment.Therewas <br />discussiontorequesttheP&Zconsiderfurthermodificationsorevenrepealingthe <br />provisionsaltogether. <br />Tofacilitatethe/ƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓƭdiscussiononthisitem,staffdevelopedthreedifferent <br />optionsforconsideration.TheoptionsincludehighlightsandstrikeƷŷƩǒƭidentifyingthe <br />variousmodificationsproposed.Followingthisdiscussion,staffwouldforwardthe <br />/ƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓƭrecommendationtotheCityCouncilinordinanceform. <br />OPTION #1 – <br /> This is the language previously recommended to the City Council as part <br />of amendments to Chapter 106 in June. This option includes an exclusion from these <br />regulations for tree removal on individual single family lots. <br />Sec.106801.Treepreservation. <br />(a)Itistheintentofthissectiontoencouragethepreservationofexistingtreeswithinthecityandto <br />prohibittheirunwarranteddestruction.Thecityencouragessiteplanningwhichfurthersthe <br />preservationoftreesandnaturalareasbythefollowingmethods:Toprotecttreesduring <br />construction;tofacilitatesitedesignandconstructionwhichcontributestothelongtermviabilityof <br />existingtrees;andtocontrolprematureremovaloftrees;requireonsitereplacementoftreesthat <br />mustberemovedandrequireoffsitereplacementoftreesthatcannotbereplacedonsite,either <br />bydirectplantingasoutlinedinsection106803(Treereplacement)orthroughacontributiontothe <br />(Treefund)ofthischapter.Itisthefurtherintentofthis <br />treefundestablishedinsection106803 <br />sectiontoachievethefollowingobjectives: <br />(1)Protecthealthytreesandpreservethenatural,environmental,andaestheticqualitiesofthe <br />citytothedegreepossible. <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.