Laserfiche WebLink
ZoningBoardofAdjustment <br />MinutesofMarch27,2014 <br />Page2of3 <br />Shenotedthereareothersimilarexistingfencesinthearea.Toremovethefencewould <br />cost$2,000. <br />C.PublicComments <br />Therewerenopubliccomments. <br />D.QuestionandAnswer <br />Therewerenone. <br />MotionbyShermanMooretoapproveVarianceRequest#1493000001,allowingafenceto <br />remainwithinthefrontyardsetbackat327DwireDr. <br />SecondbyCharlesSchoppe.MotionCarried. <br />Ayes:RodRothermel,CharlesSchoppe,T.J.Walker,ShermanMoore,andNettieWarren <br />Nays:None <br />AssistantCityAttorneyClarkAskinsreadfromSection106196oftheCodeofOrdinances: <br />AppealsfromtheBoardofAdjustment. <br />5.ApublichearingwillbeheldtoconsiderVarianceRequest#1493000002forproperty <br />identifiedasLots25through30,Block715,TownofLaPorte,JohnsonHunterSurvey,Abstract <br />No.35,HarrisCounty,Texas.Theapplicant,AnalyticStressRelieving,Inc.,seeksavariance <br />fromcurrentbuildingsetbackrequirementscontrarytotheprovisionsofSection106622of <br />theCodeofOrdinances.ThevarianceisbeingsoughtunderthetermsofSection106192of <br />theCityofLaPorteCodeofOrdinances. <br />A.StaffPresentation <br />PlanningDirectorTimTietjenspresentedthestaffreportforVarianceRequest#14 <br />93000002.Theapplicantisrequestingavariancetoallowforanencroachmentof30feet <br />intothe50footfrontsetbackandanencroachmentof20feetintotherequired30footside <br />setbackinordertoallowforconstructionofaproposedtwostoryofficebuilding.The/źƷǤ͸ƭ <br />CodeofOrdinances,Section106662,prohibitsabuildingfrombeingerectedwithinthe <br />required50footfrontsetbackandwithinthe30footsideyardsetbackinBIzoningdistricts. <br />PublichearingnoticesweremailedtotenpropertyownerslocatedwithinЋЉЉ͸ofthe <br />subjecttract.TheCityreceivedtworesponsesinfavorofthevarianceandnoneopposed. <br />B.ApplicantPresentation <br />BillPruitt,SynergyBuildingSystems,wassworninbyChairmanRothermel.Mr.Pruittstated <br />hehandledthedemolitionoftheoldbuildingandispreppingthesiteforAnalystic{ƷƩĻƭƭ͸ƭ <br />newbuilding.Mr.Pruittrequestedfavorableconsiderationofthevariancerequest. <br />C.PublicComments <br /> <br />