Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment Regular Meeting <br />May 28, 2015 <br />th <br />Oakland Land & Development 16 Street Side (North) Setback Variance <br />If the Board were to grant a variance in this case, staff would recommend that a condition be <br />considered that required the applicant to meet applicable fire rating requirements in the <br />International Fire Code and/or Building Codes. <br /> <br />Section 106-192 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the term “variance” represents a deviation <br />from the literal interpretation of the code approved by the Board subject to the fact that <br />enforcement of the provisions of the code would cause an unnecessary hardship because of <br />circumstances unique to the subject property. The Board is authorized to grant a variance when <br />the Board finds that a number of criteria are met. The following table outlines those criteria and <br />staff’s analysis of those criteria. <br />Criterion:Staff Finding: <br />a. That the granting of the variance will not be The proposed variance represents a significant <br />contrary to the public interest. deviation from the code. However, the applicant <br />has indicated they would comply with fire rating <br />requirements. Additionally the proposed <br />development would be consistent with those uses <br />surrounding it. <br />Notice was sent to all property owners within a <br />200-foot radius from the subject site in accordance <br />with code requirements. At the time this staff <br />report was drafted, no responses for or against the <br />variance were received by staff. <br />b. That literal enforcement of this chapter will <br />The exceptional hardship unique to this property <br />result in unnecessary hardship because of that would warrant the granting of the variance <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, could be considered the narrow nature of the lot, <br />topography or other extraordinary or exceptional being only 75 feet wide. Site circulation could be <br />physical situation unique to the specific piece of diminished if the applicant were required to comply <br />property in question. "Unnecessary hardship" shall with the code in this case. <br />mean physical hardship relating to the property <br />itself as distinguished from a hardship relating to <br />convenience, financial considerations or caprice, <br />and the hardship must not result from the <br />applicant or property owner's own actions. <br />c. That by granting the variance, the spirit of this If this variance were approved the proposed <br />chapter will be observed. development would be consistent with the spirit of <br />the zoning ordinance, especially based on the fact <br />that the applicant has agreed to fire rate the wall <br />that is the subject of the encroachment. <br />Appeal Procedure: <br />Sec. 106-196. - Appeals from the board of adjustment. <br />Any person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by any decision of the board of <br />adjustment, or any taxpayer, or any officer, department, board, or bureau of the city may <br />present to a court of record a petition for a writ of certiorari, as provided by V.T.C.A., Local <br />Government Code § 211.011, duly verified, setting forth that such decision is illegal, in whole or <br />3 <br /> <br />