Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment Meeting <br />November 10, 2016 <br />Bay Point Lot Size Variance <br /> <br /> <br />Additionally, in compliance with state law, notice of the public hearing was posted at City Hall and on the <br /> website at least ten days prior to the date of the public hearing. <br /> <br />Background Information: <br />The site is currently zoned GC, General Commercial. The subject site currently sits undeveloped. The <br />following table summarizes the surrounding zoning and land uses: <br /> Zoning Land Use <br />rd <br />North R-1, Low-Density Residential Residential (518 S. 3 St.) <br />rd <br />South R-1, Low-Density Residential Residential (606 S. 3 St.) <br />th <br />West R-1, Low-Density Residential Residential (601 S. 4 St.) <br />rd <br />East R-1, Low-Density Residential Residential (601 S. 3 St.) <br /> <br />Applicable Code Provisions: <br />Section 106-333, speaks to residential area requirements. The following is an excerpt from that section <br />as applicable to this variance request: <br />Uses Minimum Lot Area Minimum Yard Setbacks <br />L.F.F.R.S. <br />Single-family detached 6000 25-15-5 <br /> <br />Analysis: <br />The applicant is seeking approval of a variance that would allow her client to replat his property into two <br />lots, both under 6,000 square feet, and allow the house on the western lot to maintain a setback smaller <br />. <br /> <br />Code of Ordinances <br />the literal interpretation of the code approved by the Board subject to the fact that enforcement of the <br />provisions of the code would cause an unnecessary hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />subject property. The Board is authorized to grant a variance when the Board finds that a number of <br />criteria are met. The following table outlines those criteria and sta <br /> <br />Criterion: Staff Finding: <br />a. That the granting of the variances will not be The use of both properties would be in line with <br />contrary to the public interest the surrounding area and is the intention of the <br />zoning district. <br />The City requires minimum lot sizes and setbacks <br />as a way to protect property values and create a <br />consistent look amongst R-1 housing. <br />b. That literal enforcement of this chapter will The size of the original lot makes it impossible for <br />result in unnecessary hardship because of the lot to be platted into two conforming lots. <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, The front setback cannot be met on the new <br />topography or other extraordinary or western lot because of an existing house placed <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the on the property by the original owner in 1940. <br />specific piece of property in question. <br /> <br />