Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Technician Cramer finished by bringing attention to the public responses received <br />by the City. First, the sent in by the owner of Shaterra Properties at 410 E. Fairmont Parkway <br />stating he was against the variance as it would reduce visibility to his strip center as well as <br />visibility for those entering and exiting. The letter also stated that no hardship existed for <br />the property to require a variance. Second, a letter sent by La Porte ISD in support of the <br />variance <br />b. Applicant Presentation <br />Chairman Rothermel swore in the applicant Shane Klinkerman. The applicant echoed the <br />sentiments from staff's presentation. <br />c. Public Comments <br />There were no public comments. <br />Chairman Rothermel closed the public hearing at 6:07 PM. <br />d. Question and Answer <br />There was no question and answer <br />Motion by Doug Martin to approve Variance Request 16-93000006, a request by Pastor Shane <br />Klinkerman on behalf of the First Assembly of God Church for a tract of land located at 316 E. <br />Fairmont Parkway legally described as Blocks 1112 and 1113 of the Town of La Porte <br />Subdivision. The applicant is seeking approval of a variance to allow for a new building to be <br />placed 10' from the front property line, contrary to the provisions of Section 106-343(a) of the <br />Code of Ordinances that requires a minimum front setback of 20' in a General Commercial zone. <br />Second by Chester Pool. Motion Carried. <br />Ayes: Rod Rothermel, T.J. Walker, Nettie Warren, Chester Pool, Doug Martin <br />Nays: None <br />Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins read from Section 106-196 of the Code of Ordinances: <br />Appeals from the Board of Adjustment. <br />5. A public hearing to receive public input on Variance Request 16-93000007, a request by <br />Bayway Homes for tracts of land legally described as Lots 1-8, Block 108 and Lots 24-32, Block <br />107, Town of La Porte Subdivision. The applicant is seeking approval of multiple variances as <br />follows: <br />1. A side setback of 5' for Lot 32, Block 107 and Lot 1, Block 108; contrary to the <br />provisions of Section 106-333(a) of the Code of Ordinances that requires a minimum <br />side setback of 20' for a town house/quad raplex project. <br />2. A density of 12.5 units per acre; contrary to the provisions of Section 106-333(a) of the <br />Code of Ordinances that allows a maximum of 10 units per acre for <br />townhouse/quadraplex projects. <br />