Laserfiche WebLink
LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY <br />MINUTES <br />September 10, 2015 <br />The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM by President Kenneth Schlather. <br />Members Present: Kenneth Schlather, President; Doug Martin, Vice President; Charlie Perry, Secretary; Randy <br />Woodard <br />Members Absent: Excused absence: Dennis Steger <br />Others Present: Corby Alexander, General Manager; David Mick, La Porte Public Works Director <br />2. The August 06, 2015 minutes were reviewed and unanimously approved with Doug Martin making the motion <br />to approve and Randy Woodard seconding. <br />3. David Mick provided the background to the February 28, 2015 invoice submitted by the City of Houston for the <br />Southeast Water Purification Plant (SEWPP) improvement and expansion project bid in 2007 and constructed <br />primarily from 2008 through 2010 with some minor construction and warranty work continuing to 2012. The <br />expansion project true -up invoice is in the amount $293,763.82. The LPAWA share estimated in 2007 was <br />$891,540 less a $304,980 credit for oversized items previously funded by LPAWA recouped from those entities <br />that are participating in the 80 mgd expansion. The project, designed to increase the capacity of the SEWPP <br />from 120 mgd to the current capacity of 200 mgd, was bid at approximately $168-million with a final cost of <br />$171-million. Total change orders amounted to less than 2% of the contract amount. The co -owning entities <br />that participated in the plant expansion portion of the project contributed additional funds at the start of the <br />project equal to a 5% contingency. Those entities are receiving money back. The co -owning entities such as <br />the La Porte Area Water Authority that did not participate in the plant expansion but did participate in the cost <br />of enhancements to the previously existing 120 mgd portion of the plant owed additional funds. Staff received <br />additional information from the City of Houston on several occasions, with the final submittal received <br />September 4, 2015, as needed for staff to be comfortable recommending payment. Motion to approve staffs <br />request to pay the $293,763.82 true -up invoice was made by Randy Woodard with Charlie Perry seconding. <br />Motion was approved unanimously. <br />4. David Mick presented the background information to the FY 16 Southeast Water Purification Plant (SEWPP) <br />budget dispute. Continuing discussions initiated in the prior meeting. As the Managing Owner, the City of <br />Houston prepares the annual budget for the SEWPP. The contract between the co -owners provides a process <br />for disputing portions of the annual budget provided that: 1) more than 50% of the plant co -owners, with the <br />vote weighted by the percentage of water consumed over a 12-month period, are in agreement with the dispute, <br />and 2) the disputed line items are not necessary for the regulatory compliance, health, safety or security. The <br />board reviewed a summary of budget line items likely to be contested by a majority of the co -owners. The <br />disputed amount may be as high as $0.1102/1000 gallons pending further information from the City of Houston. <br />Staff is recommending joining with other co -owners in disputing the FY 16 budget line items totaling <br />$0.1102/1000 gallons. Staff also recommends increasing the LPAWA FY 16 budget line item for Other <br />Professional Services by $15,000 for a total budget of $25,000 for consulting and legal fees that may be <br />associated with the dispute. Staff's best estimate of the worst -case cost exposure to the LPAWA in terms of <br />legal and consulting fees is $75,000 should the dispute goes through a full trial. Motion to dispute the FY 16 <br />SEWPP budget and to increase the Other Professional Services budget by $15,000 was made by Randy Woodard <br />and seconded by Doug Martin. The motion was unanimously approved. <br />5. Corby Alexander indicated that he had no additional comments. <br />6. There were no additional comments concerning the authority from the board. <br />7. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:12 PM. <br />