My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
12-29-11 Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Agenda packets 2010 to current
>
Planning/Inspections
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2011
>
12-29-11 Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 3:10:57 PM
Creation date
3/7/2025 1:38:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
12/29/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Board of Adjustinent <br />December 24, 2011 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />n&a is : Section 106- 192(b )(1), in the Cade of Ordinances, defines a variance as a deviation fiorn <br />the literal provisions of'the chapter which is granted by the Board when strict conformity <br />to the chapter ivould cause an unnecessary har &hip because of the circumstances <br />unique to the property on - Mich the variance is granted <br />Except as other i prohibited, the board is empori�ered to authorize a variance from a <br />requirement when the board„ nds that all of the folloiving conditions have been met. <br />+� That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br />+° That literal enforcement of the chapter i result in unnecessary hardship because of <br />exceptional narroivness, shallovimess, shape, topography or ether extraordinary or <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the specific piece of property in question. <br />"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property itself <br />as distinguished fi°om a hardship relating to convenience, financial considerations or <br />caprice, and the hardship must not result fi•orn the applicant or property) owner's o vn <br />actions; and <br />+ That by granting the variance, the spirit elf the chapter will be observed <br />The Beard is charged with determining if the applicant's variance request to Section 106- <br />741, general provisions, is reasonable and whether all of the above conditions were met. <br />To determine if granting the applicant's request would be contrary to the general public, <br />Staff considered the fact that new residence, garages and accessory building are proposed <br />at the same time and the home and garage will be consistent in design. Staff also <br />recognizes that the development of the property may not create a problem with adjoining <br />properties. Adjoining properties are also single - family residential. <br />Whether the Board does or does not grant the applicant's request, development of house <br />and detached garage will proceed after obtaining a City permit. However, the applicant <br />wants to build an accessory structure as a part of an overall project. <br />When looking at the next test, Staff determined that granting the variance would still <br />observe the spirit of the law. The spirit of the ordinance is assumed to be public safety. If <br />one considers the spirit of the law is to ensure uniformity and property maintenance <br />throughout the City, Staff's notes that there are already some property irregularities (pre - <br />existing nonconformities) in the area. Therefore, it does not appear that the applicant's <br />request will create a negative impact to the property or the surrounding area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.