Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />Minutes of May 28, 2015 <br /> <br /> <br />Board Members Present: Rod Rothermel, Charles Schoppe, T.J. Walker, and Nettie Warren (Alt 1) <br />Board Members Absent: Lawrence McNeal, Chester Pool, and Doug Martin (Alt 2) <br />City Staff Present: City Planner Eric Ensey, Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins, and Office <br />Coordinator Peggy Lee <br />1.Call to Order. <br /> <br />Chairman Rod Rothermelcalled the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br />2. Roll call of members. <br /> <br />Board Members Charles Schoppe, Chester Pool, T.J. Walker, and Nettie Warren (Alt 1) were <br />present. <br /> <br />3. A public hearing will be held to consider Variance Request 15-93000004, a request by Oakland <br />th <br />Land and Development for the property located at 605 S. 16 Street to allow construction of a <br />metal office/warehouse building that is 3’ from the side (north) property line contrary to the <br />provisions of Section 106-522 of the city’s Code of Ordinances which requires a minimum 10 <br />foot side setback in the LI, Light Industrial, district. <br /> <br />Chairman Rothermel opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />a.Staff Presentation <br /> <br />City Planner Eric Ensey presented staff’s report on a variance request by Oakland Land and <br />Development to allow construction of a new office/warehouse building three feet (3’) from <br />the side (north) property line, encroaching seven feet (7’) into the side setback at 605 S. 16 th <br />Street. <br />Mr. Ensey confirmed that all requirements for public hearing notification had been met. <br /> <br />b.Applicant Presentation <br /> <br />Chairman Rothermel swore in the applicant, Bill Campbell, ACW Design and Construction, <br />consultant for Oakland Land and Development. Mr. Campbell stated the variance is needed <br />because the narrowness of the drive-thru will make it difficult for larger trucks to access the <br />truck bays. <br /> <br />c.Public Comments <br /> <br />Chairman Rothermel swore in Alan Ward. Mr. Ward explained there would not be an <br />encroachment issue had the subject property been located several blocks away in a General <br />Commercial zone; therefore he would be in favor of allowing the encroachment. <br /> <br />