Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />Page 2 -Audit Committee Minutes -July 22, 2002 <br />The committee questioned as to why there was not a credit card policy. Mr. Dolby <br />advised he was not sure why there was not a policy and he understood these cards had <br />been used since 1986. He further stated the guidelines were never developed by the <br />purchasing department and they would be the appropriate department to develop such <br />policy. This type of policy is a purchasing policy that would be enforced by the finance <br />department once implemented by purchasing. <br />The committee questioned Ms. Alexander and Mr. Dolby if any receipts were lost or <br />misplaced by the finance department. They replied to their knowledge they had never lost <br />any receipts and had never been written up by the auditors for losing any documentation or <br />receipts. They noted they handle over 100,000 transactions per year and to their <br />knowledge they have never lost any related documents. It was noted that the audits would <br />reflect if they had lost documents. <br />4. Consider retaining an independent audit firm to review credit card transactions, and submit <br />a report with recommendations. <br />Council member Warren noted he felt there were questionable transactions noted in the <br />report and the City should hire an outside independent auditor to review this matter. <br />Chairman Chuck Engelken noted he agreed with Mr. Warren. <br />Mr. Engelken noted he had talked with HGAC and they provided him with a list of <br />independent auditors (see attached list). <br />Mr. Engelken noted he feels the committee needs to identify any problems, if there is a <br />problem lets address it promptly and professionally. He wants to make sure the citizens of <br />La Porte are proud of the process followed. <br />Mr. Engelken noted the audit should identify weaknesses, review current policies, put <br />policies in place and the travel policy be reviewed. It was also noted that staff should <br />respond to some of the questionable transactions. <br />Mr. Beasley noted we should interview and meet with audit firms to show them what the <br />City has done to date and let them provide us with a recommendation for the scope of <br />work. <br />Bruce Meismer suggested that we consider having the Department of Public Safety review <br />this matter. He noted they are familiar with the operations of local government. He noted <br />this might be a less expensive options since they are not a for profit organization. <br />Bruce Meismer also suggested the committee consider hiring an outside person to oversee <br />the work of staff rather than having the consultant do all the work. This might be a more <br />cost effective means. <br />Ms. Alexander noted that Mr. Dolby is a C.P.A. and has extensive audit experience. He <br />would be very capable of conducting an internal audit and prepare recommended policies. <br />Mr. Dolby noted his only concern is he would not be independent since he is an employee <br />of the City of La Porte. <br />The committee questioned whether or not a bid processed need to be followed to hire an <br />auditing firm. The City Attorney advised this process did not have to be bid since the City <br />would be hiring an auditor to perform a professional service. He noted the committee <br />should interview firms and then select the appropriate firm based on the scope of work <br />agreed upon and costs. <br />