Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES OF THE BAYPORT EXPANSION (Cont'd) <br />Page 2 <br />La Porte. The EPA standards need to beefed up. We need to stress how it is not going to <br />be spread over eight counties. This would be more of an effect on our Community; it is <br />very close to not meeting standards. We could lose our EPA federal funding. We need <br />to inform them of our future Master Plan for the City, parks development and other future <br />development of the City. <br />There is no burden on the Port, and they don't seem to have plans to do anything to help <br />the cause. They are to use cleaner diesel fuel, etc. <br />In summary, we are considering one document, emphasizing stricter EPA standards, <br />including long term affects, particles still counted in our emissions, close proximity of <br />our residential area, leaded paint on the ships; all of these include some of the citizen's <br />concerns. Bayport would lessen the value of property. Another concern is the shipping <br />in close proximity to our residential areas. We are pointing out issues relating to <br />Bayport, addressing dredging, noise levels, effect on future recreational plans. State <br />Representatives, Congressmen, Director of EPA, other surrounding city's management, <br />et al need to be contacted; and if possible, meet with some of them. <br />We will continue work on the final draft at the next meeting on Wednesday, February 18, <br />at 6 p.m. <br />3. NEW BUSINESS <br />There was no new business. <br />COMMITTEE COMMENTS <br />There was no new business. <br />5. ADJOURNMENT <br />There being no further business to come before the Committee, this meeting was duly <br />adjourned at 6:45 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Martha A. Gillett, TRMC <br />City Secretary <br />Passed and approved on this 18th day of February 2002. <br />Chairman Chuck Engelken <br />