My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1965-05-17 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1960's
>
1965
>
1965-05-17 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:44 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/17/1965
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M ~ • . <br /> <br />Hon. H. P. Pfeiffer, Et Al Page 2 May 4, 1965 <br />who have used the same as a place to sleep, drink, and to use the <br />floor as a toilet many times. The second floor, like the first, <br />is in a very unsanitary condition. The room is cluttered with old <br />paper, rags, a mattress, boxes, bottles, and other items of fur- <br />niture, inviting a place for fire to start. The wallpaper hangs <br />from the overhead, and the windows are broken in most places, and <br />the floor is rotting away in places. <br />The entire building is infested with termites, and is definitely <br />unsuitable for human habitation. The building is probably the <br />single worse fire hazard in the City of La Porte. Because of its <br />condition, the surrounding buildings have been "penalty rated" for <br />fire insurance purposes. <br />As stated above, transients and vagrants have used the building, <br />and six different fires have been started on the second floor by <br />such persons, on the mattresses, probably from cigaret smoking. <br />• Because of its unsound structural condition, the building is lean- <br />ing, mainly because the sills, floor joists, and floors are rotted <br />through. <br />The building in question is immediately adjacent to another buil- <br />ding, containing an apartment on its second floor, and the present <br />tenant in the apartment is an elderly woman. The subject building <br />is a serious fire hazard, and, should it catch on fire, there is <br />serious doubt if the elderly tenant in the adjoining apartment <br />could be safely rescued by the fire department. Further, it is un- <br />questionable that the resulting fire would communicate to buildings <br />on both the east and west sides of the subject building. <br />Therefore, it is our opinion that the subject building, for want <br />of repair; by reason of age; by reason of its dilapidated condition; <br />by reason of the fact that it is and has been vacant for some time, <br />and has been used by vagrants and transients; by reason of the <br />bad condition of the walls, and lack of guards against fire, is a <br />fire hazard, of a very serious nature, and is so situated as to <br />endanger the person and property of others, and endangers the <br />safety of life and property in surrounding buildings. <br />C~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.