Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />land. There is no existing beneficial use to humans that will be <br />eliminated. Some flora and fauna will be displaced, but there are no <br />rare or endangered species involved. The change in the present character <br />of the area will only be changed at the construction site where new <br />~ above ground structures for the treatment plant are to be built. The <br />rights-of-way where sewer lines are to be installed will show no long <br />term changes. The area where the structures are to be built offer no <br />particular natural view, however that which does exist will be obstructed <br />to some degree by the treatment plant facilities. These will not rise at any <br />point more than 15 feet above the ground. The structures that will be <br />built above ground for this project will be concrete and low profile so <br />that they will blend with the environment. The treatment plant will be <br />fenced for safety purposes and shrubbery planting will be used along the <br />fence for landscaping. Inside the fence the area will be maintained turf. <br />As has been previously mentioned the site for the proposed treatment plant <br />is adjacent to the existing plant and is remote from any residences or <br />businesses. The prevailing wind from the southeast moves across the plant <br />and then over undeveloped acreage for several miles. Because of this <br />remoteness and the type of treatment process to be used, contact stabiliza- <br />tion, with aerobic digestion, which produces little to no odor, there will be no <br />odor problem for parks, residences, businesses, highways or other public access <br />areas. Incineration will not be used in connection with this project. As is <br />true with any treatment plant there is always a potential odor problem should <br />the plant get upset or if it is improperly operated and poorly maintained. <br />These possibilities will be minimized as much as possible by good engineer- <br />. ing design and proper training of operators plus careful supervision of <br />the operation by qualified city personnel. The Fairmont Park Treatment Pant, <br />which is to be abandoned, does not meet the criteria for Texas Water Quality <br />Board Order 69-9A. This Board Order concerns water quality in the Clear <br />Lake Watershed. The main La Porte plant discharges to Galveston Bay and at <br />this time there is no basin or areawide plan for that body of water. <br />Diversion of the Fairmont Park effluent is an acceptable solution to the <br />problem of meeting the Board Order 69-9A. The proposed quality of effluent <br />from the expanded La Porte plant is the same as the waste control order <br />parameters for the existing plant. <br />This project, by eliminating the Fairmont Park discharge to the Clear Lake <br />Watershed, will improve the quality of water in that area by the proportion <br />of that effluent to the total discharged by all entities. This is probably <br />a very insignificant amount since there is a very large volume of effluent <br />discharged into the watershed. The proposed quality of the expanded plant <br />effluent meets the requirements set forth in a recently completed study of <br />Houston Ship Channel Waste Loading. In view of this, the effects of the <br />proposed discharge on Galveston Bay water quality will be nil. It is not <br />anticipated that this proposed effluent will have either adverse or benefi- <br />cial effect on aquatic biota. Since the discharge traverses several hundred <br />feet before reaching Galveston Bay, there will be very little chlorine <br />residual at that point and should not have any effect on aquatic life. For <br />this reason dechlorination is not being considered in the project. The <br />discharge from this project will have no effects on municipal and .industrial <br />water supplies since none are drawn from the receiving waters.. <br />