My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1976-09-20 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1970's
>
1976
>
1976-09-20 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:52 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:33:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/20/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~r• ' , <br /> <br />p~~ge 1. <br /> <br />'~'0 VJHGi.. IT T4?AY COP1C'uRN <br />• <br />September 26~ 1976 <br />AT1D TO TfiE C~'~L7VCII, I,~IYBEi,S AND CONCEi-:ED =1~I,i1TuISTi~t~TG:S OF TFiE <br />CITY OF LA i=OF:TE~ TEXAS. <br />tl®~ the home owners tax payers and residents of South "Y" Street <br />La Forte are objecting to the intentiams of this city to widening our <br />street right-of-way to forty (40) feet and establishing a permanent curb <br />at this widths for the purpose of drainage ar other questionable reasons. <br />Our objections are as follows: <br />I. There has never been a pasty present or potenti~7: drainage <br />problem along this streets even after tT~e heaviest rains. <br />2, The original survey of these lots (and as late as Navember~ 1964 <br />by E, Gd, L+hrhardt~ Public Surveyor of Texas) does not allow <br />a right-of-~~ay of 40 feet. This width would encroac'n on <br />private property. <br />• <br />3. A 40 font street ~rrot~ld entail many objectionable changes <br />such as re-locating gas and r.~~ter meters telephone poles <br />metal fences valuable trees perennial flower beds <br />and parts of car ports and lawns. <br />4. r1t Least 50;~ of tine residents of this street are either <br />unemployed or have Iaw~ fixed incomes. Such individual <br />property owners are simply unable to pay the obvious cost <br />of this intended construction. <br />5. Drainage ditches would be of no advante.ge nor improvement <br />either without storm sewers. Cur lots are lower than the <br />present road beds which serves ~.s a.de7uate drainage. <br />OUR DT:SI=•iE IS TO H`~V.t+~ A GOOD fi~1RD -TOPPED STREETS udIT:: ;10 <br />CURF3S~ RETAINP~?G THE PRESENT RI(~iT - OF - ~IAY~ AT?D ~iTITrzOUT ANY <br />FURTHER ELEVATION. <br />SIGNED s I`.i:°n ADD'~SS <br />~~ ~ ~ ` <br />~'~( <br />• ;.~ ~ , <br />~~ <br />~~ <br />ri ~~ <br />~'~ r <br />~~~5°'y~ <br />~~~ ~ ~_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.