My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1977-01-24 Special Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1970's
>
1977
>
1977-01-24 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:52 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/24/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' ~ • • <br />CITY OF HOUSTON <br />INTER OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE <br />~o Mr. David F. Webb, Director FROM James R. Watkins <br />Department of Public Service <br />DATE January 6, 1977 <br />Sus~ECT Entex at Shoreacres <br /> <br />In reading the letter to honorable Mayor and City Officials from Entex pertaining <br />to an application for a rate increase, I note the letter states that in order to <br />help understand the necessity fora rate increase they are making the following <br />information available: <br />1. Inflationary pressures continue to force upward the price of various goods <br />and services which we must buy. Exhibit 1 shows that inflation has been a <br />problem through the post war era but especially since the late 60's. Al- <br />though the current rate of inflation is down somewhat, my thoughts--the <br />current rate of inflation is down somewhat and we have had inflation since <br />the post war era, especially since the late 60's. How in the world did the <br />company manage to survive? Are they telling us that they are using cost <br />data from those years to justify a rate increase today and that they sur- <br />vived all through those years without a rate increase? Entex has increased <br />wages of virtually all of its employees each year for the past eleven (11) <br />years. Are we using an eleven (11) year rate base period in this case? <br />Why go back eleven (11) years? Eleven (11) years ago very few circumstances <br />i were pertinent to today's circumstances. Rates are made for the future. <br />What happened to the increased efficiency resulting from the merger of com- <br />bining of the Houston Natural Gas distribution system with Entex? This <br />question is more relevant than what happened eleven (11) years ago. <br />3. Company is claiming that they have maintained a high level of service <br />despite inflationary pressures. Customers there may have some opinions on <br />this point. <br />4. They claim that inflation has resulted in continuous yearly increases in <br />investment per customer. So what? Isn't this about true of everything? <br />I see no real information here. <br />5. The cost of money has increased dramatically over the past ten (10) years. <br />What has happened to the cost of money in the last four (4) years? Ac- <br />cording to my~memory the prime interest rate was approdching 12% about <br />four (4) years ago and now I understand it is going down and back near <br />6% again. Perhaps it is time for Entex to consider possible refinancing. <br />6. The Company claims its rate of return is 4%. Of course I have no way to <br />.dispute this since I do not know anything about what is behind the numbers <br />that go to make the figure. I notice no details are given for the claimed <br />rate base. The Company purportr to be attempting to bargain with the Council <br />by claiming that they are asking for less than they are really entitled to <br />and that they are willing to forego this difference in order to get a speedy <br />• settlement. This is an attempting appeal but could be dangerous. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.